Medina-Grandez
AF, Llontop-Palma L, Ruíz-Mora GA, Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA, Aliaga-Del Castillo
A, Dutra V, Arriola-Guillén LE. Concordance of the facial biotype between
Bjork-Jarabak cephalometrics and photographic analysis of the facial opening
angle. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(6):e454-8.
doi:10.4317/jced.60506
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60506
__________
References
1.
Martinez K, Lehmann J, Rueda M. Asociación entre arcos dentarios con el
perfil, biotipo facial y la clase esquelética en una población de Tabasco.
Rev Tamé. 2018;7:716-722. |
|
|
|
2.
Khera AK, Singh GK, Sharma VP, Singh A. Relationship between dental arch
dimensions and vertical facial morphology in Class I subjects. J IndOrthod
Soc. 2012;46:316-324. |
|
|
|
3.
Miller SF, Vela KC, Levy SM, Southard TE, Gratton DG, Moreno LM. Patterns of
morphological integration in the dental arches of individuals with malocclusion.
Am J Hum Biol. 2016;28:879-889. |
|
|
|
4.
Ricketts, R. M. Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthod. 1961;31:141-56. |
|
|
|
5.
Björk, A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible:
longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400-411. |
|
|
|
6.
Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. Intrinsic craniofacial compensations. Angle
Orthod. 1971;41:271-285. PMid:5286714 |
|
|
|
7.
Barahona J, Benavides J. Principales análisis cefalométricos utilizados para
el diagnóstico ortodóntico. Revista Científica Odontológica. 2006;2:11-27. |
|
|
|
8.
He D, Gu Y, Sun Y. Correlations between objective measurements and subjective
evaluations of facial profile after orthodontic treatment. J Int Med Res.
2020;48:300060520936854. |
|
|
|
9.
Siécola GS, Capelozza LF, Lorenzoni DC, Janson G, Henriques JFC. Subjective
facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships. Dental Press
Journal of Orthodontics. 2017;22:87-94. |
|
|
|
10.
Rodriguez-Cárdenas Y, Arriola-Guillén L, Dioses-Tume Z, Ruíz-Mora G, Aliaga-Del
Castillo A. Influence of the components Bjork-Jarabak cephalometric analysis
on the facial profile. IJO. 2017;28:35-38. |
|
|
|
11.
Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and
reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:269-73. |
|
|
|
12.
Malkoç S, Demir A, Uysal T, Canbuldu N. Angular photogrammetric analysis of
the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:174-9. |
|
|
|
13.
Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio M, Spinuzza P, Caprioglio A, Cordasco G.
Diagnostic concordance between skeletal cephalometrics, radiograph-based
soft-tissue cephalometrics, and photograph-based soft-tissue cephalometrics.
Eur J Orthod. 2017;39:352-357. |
|
|
|
14.
Martins L, Vigorito J. Photometrix analysis applied in determining facial type.
Dental Press J. Orthod; 2012;17:1-5. |
|
|
|
15.
Mehta P, Sagarkar RM, Mathew S. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric
Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study. J Clin
Diagnóstico Res. 2017;11:60-4. |
|
|
|
16.
Heil A, Lazo Gonzalez E, Hilgenfeld T, Kickingereder P, Bendszus M, Heiland
S, et al. Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in
orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in
children and adolescents. 2017;2:e0174524. |
|
|
|
17.
Negi G, Ponnada S, Aravind NKS, Chitra P. Photogrammetric Correlation of Face
with Frontal Radiographs and Direct Measurements. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:79-83. |
|
|
|
18.
Jarabak J, Fizzell J. Technique and Treatment with Light-wire Edgewise
Appliances. 1ra ed. San Luis: Mosby; 1972. |
|
|
|
19.
Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:585-599. |
|
|
|
20.
Enriquez W. Determinación del biotipo facial según el índice VERT de Ricketts
y el ángulo de apertura facial. Revista Odontológica Basadrina. 2020;4:18-25. |
|
|
|
21.
Vivar B, Bustamante J. Correlación entre biotipo facial clínico y
cefalométrico como elementos de diagnósticos en ortodoncia. Revista
Científica Especialidades Odontológicas UG. 2018;1. |
|
|
|
22.
Jaiswal P, Gandhi A, Gupta AR, Malik N, Singh SK, Ramesh K. Reliability of
Photogrammetric Landmarks to the Conventional Cephalogram for Analyzing
Soft-Tissue Landmarks in Orthodontics. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13:171-175. |
|
|
|
23.
Oliveira M, Candemil A. Evaluación de la correlación entre el análisis
cefalométrico y facial. Revista de Investigación en Odontología. 2013;1:34-40. |
|
|
|
24.
Negi G, Chitra P. Photogrammetric reliability of frontal facial photographs
with radiographs and anthropometric measurements. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res.
2019;9:280-285. |
|
|
|
25.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki:
ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA.
2013;310:2191-4. |
|
|
|
26.
Viazis AD. Avaliação do tecido mole. In: Atlas de Ortodontia: princípios e
aplicações clínicas. São Paulo: Ed. Santos. 1996. p. 49-57. |
|
|
|
27.
Herzberg BL. Facial esthetic in relation to orthodontic treatment. Angle
Orthod. 1952;22:3-22. |
|
|
|
28.
Ricketts RM. Cephalometric synthesis. Am J Dentofacial Orthod. 1960;46:647-73. |
|
|
|
29.
Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology. Is there a
relationship? An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:127-38. PMid:3874569 |
|
|
|
30.
Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment
planning: part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:395-411. |
|
|
|
31.
Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:346- 55. |