Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Freitas KMS, Secco M, Pinzan A, Cotrin P, Valarelli FP, Janson G, Freitas MR. Incisors’ bone height and inclination changes after orthodontic treatment with a self-ligating passive system. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(8):e635-40.

doi:10.4317/jced.60669

_________

References

1. Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocclusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:359-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70035-5 PMid:8876484

2. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Active or passive self-ligating brackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:12.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.019 PMid:20122421

3. Vajaria R, BeGole E, Kusnoto B, Galang MT, Obrez A. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:647-52. https://doi.org/10.2319/071910-420.1 PMid:21446870 PMCid:PMC8919756

4. Cattaneo PM, Salih RA, Melsen B. Labio-lingual root control of lower anterior teeth and canines obtained by active and passive self-ligating brackets. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:691-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/071212-575.1 PMid:23249256 PMCid:PMC8754038

5. Atik E, Akarsu-Guven B, Kocadereli I, Ciger S. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149:830-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.024 PMid:27241993

6. Atik E, Ciger S. An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:615-22. https://doi.org/10.2319/093013-712.1 PMid:24423203 PMCid:PMC8650438

7. Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, Johal A. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:185-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.012 PMid:23910199

8. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:208-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.030 PMid:17693371

9. Prettyman C, Best AM, Lindauer SJ, Tufekci E. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:1060-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/101311-640.1 PMid:22409395 PMCid:PMC8813149

10. Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:670-80.

11. Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P. Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:239-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80006-0 PMid:8814023

12. Yared KF, Zenobio EG, Pacheco W. Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:6 e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.015 PMid:16849063

13. Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, Kim DG, Tee BC, Fields H. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:e117-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.08.016 PMid:21300222

14. Menezes CC, Janson G, da Silveira Massaro C, Cambiaghi L, Garib DG. Precision, reproducibility, and accuracy of bone crest level measurements of CBCT cross sections using different resolutions. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:535-42. https://doi.org/10.2319/040115-214.1 PMid:26488463 PMCid:PMC8601492

15. Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120:201-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00964.x PMid:22607336

16. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:S109-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.013 PMid:20381751

17. Wood R, Sun Z, Chaudhry J, Tee BC, Kim D-G, Leblebicioglu B, et al. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:353-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.019 PMid:23452969

18. Vasconcelos TV, Neves FS, Moraes LAB, Freitas DQ. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0035 PMid:25715034

19. Gaia BF, Sales MAO, Perrella A, Fenyo-Pereira M, Cavalcanti MGP. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography for identification of simulated bone lesions. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:362-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000400014 PMid:21860924

20. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:734-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021 PMid:22051495

21. Westerlund A, Oikimoui C, Ransjö M, Ekestubbe A, Bresin A, Lund H. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of the long-term effects of orthodontic retainers on marginal bone levels. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.029 PMid:28024787

22. Garlock DT, Buschang PH, Araujo EA, Behrents RG, Kim KB. Evaluation of marginal alveolar bone in the anterior mandible with pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography in nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149:192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.034 PMid:26827975

23. Morais JF, Melsen B, de Freitas KM, Castello Branco N, Garib DG, Cattaneo PM. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: A cone beam computed tomographic study. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:748-56. https://doi.org/10.2319/101117-686.1 PMid:29911904 PMCid:PMC8174062

24. Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Lee RT. Randomized clinical trial of orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:738-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.023 PMid:20685528

25. Fleming PS, Johal A. Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:575-84. https://doi.org/10.2319/081009-454.1 PMid:20050755 PMCid:PMC8985730

26. DiBiase AT, Nasr IH, Scott P, Cobourne MT. Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:e111-e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.020 PMid:21300221

27. Johansson K, Lundstrom F. Orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional edgewise twin brackets: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:929-34. https://doi.org/10.2319/101911-653.1 PMid:22397386 PMCid:PMC8823125

28. Jung M-H. Factors influencing treatment efficiency: A prospective cohort study. Angle Orthod. 2021;91:1-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/050220-379.1 PMid:33289803 PMCid:PMC8032291

29. Miethke RR, Melsen B. Effect of variation in tooth morphology and bracket position on first and third order correction with preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:329-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70246-5 PMid:10474107

30. Barbosa BV, Perez-Gomes JP, Santamaria MP. Influence of voxel size on the accuracy of linear measurements of the condyle in images of cone beam computed tomography: a pilot study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10:e876. PMid:30386520 PMCid:PMC6203913