Soliman TA, Raffat-Hussein EM, Ellayeh M, Farahat DS. Effect of Surface Treatments on Adhesion of Milled Polyetheretherketone Post to Different Composite Resin Core Build-Up Materials. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(9):e742-8.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.60740

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60740

_________

 

References

1. Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Tay FR, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts. Dental Materials.2007;23:95-99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.005
PMid:16434092

 

2. Vano M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tognini F, Gabriele M, Tay FR. The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores: the evaluation of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. International Endodontic Journal. 2006;39:31-39.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01044.x
PMid:16409326

 

3. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Cury AH, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations. Dental Materials. 2006;22:602-609.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.018
PMid:16289722

4. Akgungor G, Sen D, Aydin M. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material. JPD. 2208;99:388-399.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60088-8
PMid:18456050

 

5. Cekic-Nagas I, Sukuroglu E, Canay S. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials? Journal of Dentistry. 2011;39:171-179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.008
PMid:21115098

 

6. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M (2003) Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2003;16:593-596.

 

7. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. JPD. 2006;95:218-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.006
PMid:16543019

 

8. Zalkind M, Shkury S, Stern N, Heling I. Effect of prefabricated metal post-head design on the retention of various core materials. Journal of Oral Rehab. 200;27:483-487.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00535.x
PMid:10888275

 

9. Parisi C, Valandro LF, Ciocca L, Gatto MR, Baldissara P. Clinical outcomes and success rates of quartz fiber post restorations: a retrospective study. JPD. 2015;114:367-372.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.011
PMid:26013066

 

10. Abduljawad M, Samran A, Kadour J, Al-Afandi M, Ghazal M, Kern M. Effect of fiber posts on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth with cervical cavities: an in vitro study. JPD. 2016;116:80-84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.011
PMid:26868963

 

11. Mumcu E, Erdemir U, Topcu FT. Comparison of micro push-out bond strengths of two fiber posts luted using simplified adhesive approaches. Dent Mater J. 2010;29:286-296.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-089
PMid:20495284

 

12. Song CH, Choi JW, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lee SH, Kang ES, et al. Comparison of the micro tensile bond strength of a polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) tooth post cemented with various surface treatments and various resin cements. Materials (Basel). 2018;11:916.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060916
PMid:29844270 PMCid:PMC6025344

 

13. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:94-98.

 

14. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Lenz J, Scheuber S, Schweizerhof K, Rues S. Teeth restored using fiber-reinforced posts: in vitro fracture tests and finite element analysis. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3747-3754
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.012
PMid:20227533

 

15. Benli M, Eker Gümüs¸ B, Kahraman Y, Huck O, Özcan M. Surface characterization and bonding properties of milled polyetheretherketone dental posts. Odontology. 2020;108:596-606.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00484-1
PMid:31965408

 

16. Kurtz SM, Devine JNV. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-4869.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
PMid:17686513 PMCid:PMC2040108

 

17. Silthamitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:668-674.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-349
PMid:27477234

 

18. Henriques B, Fabris D, Mesquita-Guimarães J, et al. Influence of laser structuring of PEEK, PEEK-GF30 and PEEK-CF30 surfaces on the shear bond strength to a resin cement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;84:225-234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.008
PMid:29803137

 

19. Chaijareenont P, Prakhamsai S, Silthampitag P, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effects of different sulfuric acid etching concentrations on PEEK surface bonding to resin composite. Dent Mater J. 2018;37:385-392.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-141
PMid:29375092

 

20. Georgiev J, Vlahova A, Kissov H, Aleksandrov S, Kazakova R. Possible application of BioHPP in prosthetic dentistry: a literature review. J IMAB. 2018;24:1896-1898.
https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2018241.1896

 

21. Skirbutis G, Dzingute A, Masiliunaite V, Sulcaite G, Zilinskas J. PEEK polymer's properties and its use in prosthodontics. A review. Stomatology. 2018;20:54-58.

 

22. Maekawa M, Kanno Z, Wada T, Hongo T, Doi H, Hanawa T, et al. Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires made of super engineering plastic. Dent Mater J. 2015;34:114-119.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-202
PMid:25748467

 

23. Soliman TA, Raffat EM, Farahat DS. Evaluation of Mechanical Behavior of CAD/CAM Polymers for Long-term Interim Restoration Following Artificial Aging. EJPD. 2022;28:22-30.

 

24. Lee KS, Shin MS, Lee JY, Ryu JJ, Shin SW. Shear bond strength of composite resin to high performance polymer PEKK according to surface treatments and bonding materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:350-357.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.350
PMid:29142642 PMCid:PMC5673611

 

25. Zhou L, Qien Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater. 2014;30:209-215.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.011
PMid:24768752

 

26. Warangkulkasemkit S, Pumpaluk P. Comparison of physical properties of three commercial composite core build-up materials. Dent Mater J. 2019;38:177-181.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-038
PMid:30381634

 

27. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. JPD. 2014;112:1278-1288.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.014
PMid:24969411

 

28. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2014;30:357-363.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008
PMid:24461250

 

29. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri B, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization. Dental Materials. 2005;21:437-444.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.012
PMid:15826700

 

30. Zoidis P. Polyetheretherketone overlay prosthesis over high noble ball attachments to overcome base metal sensitivity: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:688-693.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12747
PMid:29322657

 

31. Kienanen P, Alander P, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Bonding of ceramic insert to a laboratory particle filler composite. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2005;63:272-277.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350510020025
PMid:16419432

 

32. Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dent Mater. 2012;28:280-1283.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.010
PMid:23036863

 

33. Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hämmerle CHF. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;258:7213- 7218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.040

 

34. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hämmerle CHF, Fischer J. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater. 2010;26:553-559.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.003
PMid:20206986

 

35. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101:1209-1216.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32932
PMid:23564476

 

36. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater. 2013;29:269-277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.002
PMid:23228335

 

37. Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Influence of increment thickness on microhardness and dentin bond strength of bulk fill resin composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30:1104-1112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.001
PMid:25086481

 

38. Moosavi H, Rezaei F, Fazli M, Rakhshan F. Push-Out Bond Strength of Composite Polymerization Methods with Universal Adhesive to Coronal Dentin. Eur J Gen Dent. 2021;10:139-143.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736374

 

39. Martins VDM, Silva CF, Almeida LM, de Puala MS, Menezes MS, Santos-Filho PCF. Bond strength of glass fiber posts cemented with bulk-fill flowable composite resin. Appl Adhes Sci. 2019;7:3.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40563-019-0119-6

 

40. Soliman TA, Ghorab S. Color, translucency, and masking ability of a recently developed bulk-fill resin composite. EDJ. 2018;64:1785-1793.
https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.78436