Aydın N,
Karaoğlanoğlu S, Kılıç-Süloğlu A, Öztürk S. Comparison of the Cytotoxic Effect
of 3D-Printed Resins, Resin-based CAD/CAM blocks and Composite Resin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(12):e984-90.
doi:10.4317/jced.60987
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60987
________
References
1.
Fugolin APP, Pfeifer CS. New resins for dental composites. J Dent Res.
2017;96:1085-91. |
|
|
|
2.
Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J
Dent Res. 2014;93:1232-4. |
|
|
|
3.
Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors influencing the dimensional
accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using
stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:503-10. |
|
|
|
4.
Palaganas NB, Mangadlao JD, de Leon ACC, Palaganas JO, Pangilinan KD, Lee YJ,
et al. 3D printing of photocurable cellulose nanocrystal composite for
fabrication of complex architectures via stereolithography. ACS Appl Mater
Interfaces. 2017;9:34314-24. |
|
|
|
5.
Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, et
al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge
dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34:192-200. |
|
|
|
6.
Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among
expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016;32:54-64. |
|
|
|
7.
Piedra-Cascón W, Krishnamurthy VR, Att W, Revilla-León M. 3D printing
parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures of
vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: A narrative review. J
Dent. 2021;109:103630. |
|
|
|
8.
Salmi M. Possibilities of preoperative medical models made by 3D printing or
additive manufacturing. J Med Eng. 2016;2016:1-6. |
|
|
|
9.
Barutcigil K, Dündar A, Batmaz SG, Yıldırım K, Barutçugil Ç. Do resin-based
composite CAD/CAM blocks release monomers? Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:329-36. |
|
|
|
10.
Geurtsen W, Lehmann F, Spahl W, et al. Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin
composite monomers/additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary
fibroblast cultures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;41:474-80. |
|
|
|
11.
Ling L, Ma Y, Malyala R. A novel CAD/CAM resin composite block with high
mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2021;37:1150-5. |
|
|
|
12.
Canatan S, Oz FD, Bolay S. A randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of
two resin cement systems in the adhesion of CAD/CAM-fabricated resin
nanoceramic restorations: 18-month preliminary results. J Esthet Restor Dent.
2022;34:1005-14. |
|
|
|
13.
Atria PJ, Bordin D, Marti F, Nayak VV, Conejo J, Benalcázar Jalkh E, et al.
3D-printed resins for provisional dental restorations: Comparison of
mechanical and biological properties. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34:804-15. |
|
|
|
14.
ISO 10993-12:2021. Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 12: Sample
preparation and reference materials, Geneva, 2021. |
|
|
|
15.
Van Landuyt KL, Nawrot T, Geebelen B, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Yoshihara K,
et al. How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical
approach. Dent Mater. 2011;27:723-47. |
|
|
|
16.
Murray PE, García Godoy C, García Godoy F. How is the biocompatibilty of dental
biomaterials evaluated? Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:258-66. PMid:17468726 |
|
|
|
17.
ISO 10993-5:2009. Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 12: Sample
preparation and reference materials, Geneva, 2009. |
|
|
|
18.
Lim SM, Yap AUJ, Loo CSL, Ng J, Goh CY, Hong C, et al. Comparison of
cytotoxicity test models for evaluating resin-based composites. Human Exp
Toxicol. 2016;34:339-48. |
|
|
|
19.
Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil.
1994;21:441-52. |
|
|
|
20.
Altintas SH, Usumez A. Evaluation of monomer leaching from a dual cured resin
cement. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2008;86B:523-9. |
|
|
|
21.
Taormina G, Sciancalepore C, Messori M, Bondioli F. 3Dprinting processes for
photocurable polymeric materials: technologies, materials, and future trends.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2018;16:151-60. |
|
|
|
22.
Kessler A, Reichl FX, Folwaczny M, Högg C. Monomer release from surgical
guide resins manufactured with different 3D printing devices. Dent Mater.
2020;36:1486-92. |
|
|
|
23.
Moharamzadeh K, Noort RV, Brook IM, Scutt AM. Cytotoxicity of resin monomers
on human gingival fibroblasts and HaCaT keratinocytes. Dent Mater. 2007;23:40-44. |
|
|
|
24.
Grenade C, De Pauw-Gillet MC, Pirard C, Bertrand V, Charlier C, Vanheusden A,
et al. Biocompatibility of polymer-infiltrated-ceramicnetwork (PICN) materials
with human gingival keratinocytes (HGKs). Dent Mater. 2017;33:333-43. |
|
|
|
25.
Tassin M, Bonte E, Loison-Robert LS, Nassif A, Berbar T, Le Goff S, et al.
Effects of high-temperature pressurepolymerized resin-infiltrated ceramic
networks on oral stemcells. PLoS One. 2016;11:1-16. |
|
|
|
26.
Krifka S, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. A review of adaptive mechanisms
in cell responses towards oxidativestress caused by dental resin monomers.
Biomaterials. 2013;34:4555-63. |
|
|
|
27.
Wuersching SN, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, Kollmuss M. Initial biocompatibility of
novel resins for 3D printed fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater. 2022;38:1587-97. |
|
|
|
28.
Ide Y, Nayar S, Logan H, Gallagher B, Wolfaardt J. The effect of the angle of
acuteness of additive manufactured models and the direction of printing on
the dimensional fidelity: clinical implications. Odontology. 2017;105:108-115. |
|
|
|
29.
Lin CH, Lin YM, Lai YL, Lee SY. Mechanical properties, accuracy, and
cytotoxicity of UV-polymerized 3D printing resins composed of Bis-EMA, UDMA,
and TEGDMA. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:349-354. |
|
|
|
30.
Kim D, Shim JS, Lee D, Shin SH, Nam NE, Park KH, et al. Effects of
post-curing time on the mechanical and color properties of three-dimensional
printed crown and bridge materials. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12:2762. |
|
|
|
31.
Bayarsaikhan E, Lim JH, Shin SH, Park KH, Park YB, Lee JH, et al. Effects of
postcuring temperature on the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of
three-dimensional printed dental resin material. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13:1180. |
|
|
|
32.
Süsgün Yıldırım Z, Eyiler E, Bek Kürklü ZG. Effect of thickness on the degree
of conversion, monomer elution, depth of cure and cytotoxicity of bulk-fill composites.
J Oral Sci. 2023;65:121-6. |