Ribeiro PFA, Hashizume LN, Arriola-Guillén LE, Madeira K, Vizzotto MB, da Silveira HLD. The interference of digital radiographic image acquisition and processing protocols in the diagnosis of incipient enamel carious lesions. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(2):e96-103.

doi:10.4317/jced.60990

________

References

1. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet (London, England). 2007;369:51-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 PMid:17208642

2. Wenzel A. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions. Journal of dental research. 2004;83:C72-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301s14 PMid:15286126

3. Ferreira LM, Queiroz PM, Santaella GM, Wenzel A, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. The influence of different scan resolutions on the detection of proximal caries lesions. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019;49:97-102. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.2.97 PMid:31281786 PMCid:PMC6597374

4. White SC, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:689-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.006 PMid:18805224

5. Nyvad B, Fejerskov O. Assessing the stage of caries lesion activity on the basis of clinical and microbiological examination. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25:69-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00901.x PMid:9088694

6. Dehghani M, Barzegari R, Tabatabai H, Ghanea S. Diagnostic value of conventional and digital radiography for detection of cavitated and non-cavitated proximal caries. J Dent (Tehran). 2017;14:21-30. PMid:28828014 PMCid:PMC5557993

7. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 8th ed. Division HS, editor. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020.

8. White SC, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dental clinics of North America. 2008;52:689-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.006 PMid:18805224

9. Wenzel A. A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:307-14. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/64693712 PMid:16940477

10. Haiter-Neto F, Casanova MS, Frydenberg M, Wenzel AJOS. Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:116-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.031 PMid:19101494

11. Haiter-Neto F, Pontual AdA, Frydenberg M, Wenzel AJCoi. Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12:217-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0173-5 PMid:18210170

12. Ferreira RI, Haiter-Neto F, Tabchoury CP, Bóscolo FN. In vitro induction of enamel subsurface demineralization for evaluation of diagnostic imaging methods. Journal of applied oral science: revista FOB. 2007;15:392-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000500004 PMid:19089167 PMCid:PMC4327258

13. Isidor S, Faaborg-Andersen M, Hintze H, Kirkevang LL, Frydenberg M, Haiter-Neto F, et al. Effect of monitor display on detection of approximal caries lesions in digital radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:537-41. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/21071028 PMid:20026711

14. Galvão NS, Nascimento EHL, Lima CAS, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F, Oliveira ML. Can a high-density dental material affect the automatic exposure compensation of digital radiographic images? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20180331. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180331 PMid:30540916 PMCid:PMC6476359

15. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis: Pearson Education India; 1999.

16. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research: CRC press; 1990. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429258589

17. RA M. Epidemiologia. São Paulo: Atheneu,; 2009. 685 p p.

18. Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Gotfredsen E. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:418-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.016 PMid:17321456

19. Wenzel A, Hintze H. The choice of gold standard for evaluating tests for caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:132-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600439 PMid:10740465

20. Berkhout W, Verheij J, Syriopoulos K, Li G, Sanderink G, Van Der Stelt PF. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007;36:204-10. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/99904877 PMid:17536087

21. Pittayapat P, Oliveira-Santos C, Thevissen P, Michielsen K, Bergans N, Willems G, et al. Image quality assessment and medical physics evaluation of different portable dental X-ray units. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201:112-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.041 PMid:20554135

22. Li G, Berkhout W, Sanderink G, Martins M, Van Der Stelt PF. Detection of in vitro proximal caries in storage phosphor plate radiographs scanned with different resolutions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:325-9. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/62591340 PMid:18757717

23. Dantas RVF, Sarmento HR, Duarte RM, Raso SSMM, De Andrade AKM, Dos Anjos-Pontual ML. Radiopacity of restorative composites by conventional radiograph and digital images with different resolutions. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43:145-51. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.3.145 PMid:24083207 PMCid:PMC3784673

24. Nejaim Y, Gomes AF, Silva EJ, Groppo FC, Haiter Neto F. The influence of number of line pairs in digital intra-oral radiography on the detection accuracy of horizontal root fractures. Dent Traumatol. 2016;32:180-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12243 PMid:26542421

25. Lacerda MF, Junqueira RB, Lima TM, Lima CO, Girelli CF, Verner FS. Radiographic Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption in Multi-Rooted Teeth: The Influence of Spatial Resolution. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2020;33:14-21. https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.33/1/014 PMid:32621594

26. Li G, Yoshiura K, Welander U, Shi X, McDavid WD. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:113-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600675 PMid:12076051

27. Choi JW, Han WJ, Kim EK. Image enhancement of digital periapical radiographs according to diagnostic tasks. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:31-5. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.31 PMid:24701456 PMCid:PMC3972403

28. Bardal R, Mobini M, Mirzaee M. In vitro comparison of two photostimulable phosphor plate systems for early detection of occlusal dentin caries with and without a sharpening filter. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020;14:223. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.046 PMid:33575011 PMCid:PMC7867687

29. Kositbowornchai S, Basiw M, Promwang Y, Moragorn H, Sooksuntisakoonchai N. Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:236-40. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/94305126 PMid:15533977

30. Belém MDF, Ambrosano GMB, Tabchoury CPM, Ferreira-Santos RI, Haiter-Neto F. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27:245-51. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013000300004 PMid:23739784