Signore A,
Solimei L, Arakelyan MG, Benedicenti S, Mollica C. A 24-month randomized
clinical study of flowable bulk-fill resin composites in Class III restorations. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(2):e111-23.
doi:10.4317/jced.61153
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61153
________
References
|
1.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al.
Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and
future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215-235. PMid:12760693 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29-38. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, et
al. Anterior composite restorations: a systematic review on long-term
survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015;31:1214-1224. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Demirci M, Tuncer S, Sancakli HS, Tekçe N, Baydemir C. Five-year Clinical
Evaluation of a Nanofilled and a Nanohybrid Composite in Class IV Cavities.
Oper Dent. 2018;43:261-271. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Dietschi D, Shahidi C, Krejci I. Clinical performance of direct anterior
composite restorations: a systematic literature review and critical
appraisal. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14:252-270. PMid:31312812 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior
restorations: a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015;31:481-495. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Geitel B, Kwiatkowski R, Zimmer S, Barthel CR, Roulet JF, Jahn KR. Clinically
controlled study on the quality of class III, IV and V composite restorations
after two years. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6:247-253. PMid:15536856 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Loguercio AD, Lorini E, Weiss RV, Tori AP, Picinatto CC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A.
A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in class III restorations.
J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:57-64. PMid:17432402 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Dietschi D. Layering Concepts in Anterior Composite Restorations. J Adhes
Dent. 2001;3:71-80. PMid:11317387 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Vanini L. Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract
Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996;8:673-682. PMid:9242140 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
El-Damanhoury HM, Platt JA. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and
related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014;39:374-382. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Garcia D, Yaman P, Dennison J, Neiva GF. Polymerization Shrinkage and Depth
of Cure of Bulk Fill Flowable Composite Resins. Oper Dent. 2014;39:441-448. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts DC. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental
resin composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30:149-154. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Ilie N, Keßler A, Durner J. Influence of various irradiation processes on the
mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based
composites. J Dent. 2013;41:695-702. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk- fill composites: a
review of the current literature. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19:95-109. PMid:28443833 |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
El-Safty S, Silikas N, Watts DC. Creep deformation of restorative
resin-composites intended for bulk-fill placement. Dent Mater.
2012;28:928-935. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro
assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent. 2013;38:618-625. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Thomaidis S, Kakaboura A, Mueller WD, Zinelis S. Mechanical properties of
contemporary composite resins and their interrelations. Dent Mater.
2013;29:e132-141. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk
fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig.
2014;18:1991-2000. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G.
Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill
composites. J Dent. 2014;42:993-1000. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Frascino S, Fagundes TC, Silva U, Rahal V, Barboza A, Santos PH, et al.
Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial of Class II Restorations Using
Low-shrinkage Flowable Resin Composite. Oper Dent. 2020;45:19-29. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP,
de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin
composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:221-233. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated
guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg.
2011;9:672-677. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Bayne SC, Schmalz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation
methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative
materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:209-214. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
D'Agostino RB Sr, Massaro JM. New developments in medical clinical trials. J
Dent Res. 2004;83:C18-24. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Demirci M, Yildiz E, Uysal O. Comparative clinical evaluation of different
treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in
Class III cavities: two-year results. Oper Dent. 2008;33:7-14. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Ermis RB, Temel UB, Cellik EU, Kam O. Clinical performance of a two-step
self-etch adhesive with additional enamel etching in Class III cavities. Oper
Dent. 2010;35:147-155. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Opdam NJM, Collares K, Hickel R, Bayne SC, Loomans BA, Cenci MS, et al.
Clinical studies in restorative dentistry: new directions and new demands.
Dent Mater. 2018;34:1-12. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Reusens B, D'hoore W, Vreven J. In vivo comparison of a microfilled and a
hybrid minifilled composite resin in Class III restorations: 2-year
follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3:62-69. |
|
|
|
|
|
30.
Baldissera RA, Corrêa MB, Schuch HS, Collares K, Nascimento GG, Jardim PS, et
al. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior
teeth? J Dent. 2013;41:1027-1035. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.
Deliperi S. Clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and composite
resin restorations: five-year results. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008;3:148-159. PMid:19655528 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.
Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five
dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations.
Int Dent J. 1996;46:126-130. PMid:8886864 |
|
|
|
|
|
33.
De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, et
al. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to
bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2003;16:414-420. PMid:15002958 |
|
|
|
|
|
34.
Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans
M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step
self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of
enamel. Dent Mater. 2005;21:375-383. |
|
|
|
|
|
35.
van Dijken JW, Olofsson AL, Holm C. Five year evaluation of Class III
composite resin restorations in cavities pre-treated with an oxalic- or a
phosphoric acid conditioner. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:364-371. |
|
|
|
|
|
36.
Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching
enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005;21:895-910. |
|
|
|
|
|
37.
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I:
Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17:296-308. |
|
|
|
|
|
38.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL.
State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27:17-28. |
|
|
|
|
|
39.
Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayami Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al.
Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res.
2004;83:454-458. |
|
|
|
|
|
40.
Moura SK, Pelizzaro A, Dal Bianco K, de Goes MF, Loguercio AD, Reis A, et al.
Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface
morphology of enamel? J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:75-83. PMid:16708718 |
|
|
|
|
|
41.
Nazari A, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J. Pre-etching vs. grinding in promotion
of adhesion to intact enamel using self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J.
2012;31:394-400. |
|
|
|
|
|
42.
Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives
part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001;17:430-444. |
|
|
|
|
|
43.
Perdigão J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to
intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15:32-41 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.
Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van
Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior
acid-etching. J Dent. 2006;34:77-85. |
|
|
|
|
|
45.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek
B. A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives
in non-carious class-V lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:129-137. |
|
|
|
|
|
46.
Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: Effect of
thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin
composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:397-412. |
|
|
|
|
|
47.
Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, et al.
Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J
Adhes Dent. 2001;3:237-245. PMid:11803711 |
|
|
|
|
|
48.
Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal
quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J
Dent. 2011;39:643-647. |
|
|
|
|
|
49.
Agarwal RS, Hiremath H, Agarwal J, Garg A. Evaluation of cervical marginal
and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: An in vitro study.
J Conserv Dent. 2015;18:56-61. |
|
|
|
|
|
50.
Hirata R, Clozza E, Giannini M, Farrokhmanesh E, Janal M, Tovar N, Bonfante
EA, Coelho PG. Shrinkage assessment of low shrinkage composites using
micro-computed tomography. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.
2015;103:798-806. |
|
|
|
|
|
51.
Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jassé FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal
adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulkfill composites. J Dent.
2014;42:575-581. |
|
|
|
|
|
52.
Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite
based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater. 2011;27:348-355. |
|
|
|
|
|
53.
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World
Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct
andindirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent.
2010;12:259-272. |
|
|
|
|
|
54.
Sarrett DC. Prediction of clinical outcomes of a restoration based on in vivo
marginal quality evaluation. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:117-120. PMid:18341238 |
|
|
|
|
|
55.
van Dijken JW. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:65-70. PMid:11317385 |
|
|
|
|
|
56.
Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Critical appraisal, to bevel or not in anterior
composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17:264-269. |
|
|
|
|
|
57.
Briso ALF, Mestrener SR, Delicio G, Sundfeld RH, Bedran-Russo AK, De
Alexandre RS, et al. Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in
posterior composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2007;32:421-426. |
|
|
|
|
|
58.
Akpata ES, Behbehani J. Effect of bonding systems on post-operative
sensitivity from posterior composites. Am J Dent. 2006;19:151-154. PMid:16838478 |
|
|
|
|
|
59.
Reis A, Loguercio AD, Schroeder M, Luque-Martinez I, Masterson D, Maia LC.
Does the adhesive strategy influence the post-operative sensitivity in adult
patients with posterior resin composite restorations? A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015;31:1052-1067. |
|