Amini P, Hejazi M, Taghva M, Safari S. Evaluation of the effect of surface roughness and modification of implant abutment axial wall on the retention of zirconium oxide copings before and after thermocycling. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(4):e399-405.

doi:10.4317/jced.61175

______

References

1. Abbo B, Razzoog ME, Vivas J, Sierraalta M. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2008;99:25-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60005-0 PMid:18182182

2. Kokubo Y, Kano T, Tsumita M, Sakurai S, Itayama A, Fukushima S. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2010;37:48-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02013.x PMid:19849775

3. Rödiger M, Rinke S, Ehret-Kleinau F, Pohlmeyer F, Lange K, Bürgers R, et al. Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent, and cleaning method during re-cementation. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2014;6:233-40. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.233 PMid:25006388 PMCid:PMC4085248

4. Nejatidanesh F, Savabi O, Shahtoosi M. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents. Clinical oral implants research. 2013;24:20-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02358.x PMid:22092303

5. Bernal G, Okamura M, Munoz CA. The effects of abutment taper, length, and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2003;12:111-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00006-8 PMid:12964683

6. Ganbarzadeh J, Nakhaei MR, Shiezadeh F, Abrisham SM. The Effect of Abutment Surface Roughness on the Retention of Implant-Supported Crowns Cemented with Provisional Luting Cement. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques. 2012;1:6-10. PMid:16765158

7. Farzin M, Torabi K, Ahangari AH, Derafshi R. Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran). 2014;11:256. PMid:25628660 PMCid:PMC4290753

8. Elsharkawy S, Shakal M, Elshahawy W. Effect of various surface treatments of implant abutment and metal cope fitting surface on their bond strength to provisional resin cement. Tanta Dental Journal. 2015;12:235-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2015.05.002

9. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JYJTJopd. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9 PMid:12886205

10. Shayegh S, Salari A, Ayoubi M, Younesi F. Effect of three types of temporary luting agents and abutment surface sandblasting on retentive strength of implant supported fixed prostheses. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of IRAN (JIDAI) Spring 2015;27.

11. Nejatidanesh F, Savabi O, Jabbari E. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014;112:38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.026 PMid:24388717

12. Covey DA, Kent DK, Germain HAS, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000;83:344-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70138-7 PMid:10709044

13. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;68:885-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90544-K PMid:1494113

14. Maeyama H, Sawase T, Jimbo R, Kamada K, Suketa N, Fukui J, et al. Retentive strength of metal copings on prefabricated abutments with five different cements. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2005;7:229-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00068.x PMid:16336914

15. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clinical oral implants research. 2002;13:343-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x PMid:12175370

16. Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Muñoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27:36-41. PMid:22299076

17. Sheets JL, Wilcox C, Wilwerding T. Cement Selection for Cement-Retained Crown Technique with Dental Implants. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008;17:92-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00262.x PMid:17971122

18. Taylor TD, Belser U, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic considerations. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2000;11:101-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1101.x PMid:11168260

19. Ajay R, Suma K, Ali SA, Sivakumar JSK, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, et al. Effect of surface modifications on the retention of cement-retained implant crowns under fatigue loads: An In vitro study. 2017;9:S154. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_146_17 PMid:29284956 PMCid:PMC5731005

20. El-Helbawy NGE-D, El-Hatery AAE-W, Ahmed MHJIJoO, Implants M. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography. 2016;31:555-62. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4355 PMid:27183064

21. Pitta J, Burkhardt F, Mekki M, Fehmer V, Mojon P, Sailer IJTJoPD. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion of a titanium base abutment on the stability of the bonded interface and retention forces of crowns after artificial aging. 2021;126:214-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.013 PMid:32921422

22. Kemarly K, Arnason S, Parke A, Lien W, Vandewalle KJOD. Effect of various surface treatments on Ti-base coping retention. 2020;45:426-34. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-155-LR PMid:32053453

23. Das A, Alqahtani FA, Abdulaziz F, AlFadel M, AlJabri R, Elkhyat TJWJoD. Impact of Different Implant Abutment Geometry on Retention of Implant-supported Cement Retained Prosthesis: A Comparative Study. 2023;14:259-62. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2203

24. Negahdari R, Bohlouli S, Yazdani J, Torab A, Dizaj SMJD, Problems M. Effect of different geometric changes in the dental implant abutment body on the amount of residual excess cement and retention in a cemented implant-supported prosthesis. 2021;58:207-13. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/127347 PMid:34019744

25. Tan KM, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Limkangwalmongkol P, Romberg EJTJopd. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns. 2012;107:80-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60028-6 PMid:22304741

26. Derafshi R, Ahangari AH, Torabi K, Farzin M. Evaluation of the effect of axial wall modification and coping design on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015;9:35-9. PMid:25973152 PMCid:PMC4417491

27. Wolfart M, Wolfart S, Kern M. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:519-25. PMid:16955601

28. Reddy SV, Reddy MS, Reddy CR, Pithani P, Kumar S, Kulkarni GJJoc, et al. The influence of implant abutment surface roughness and the type of cement on retention of implant-supported crowns. 2015;9:ZC05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12060.5621 PMid:25954694 PMCid:PMC4413144

29. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials: Mosby; 1980.

30. de Campos TN, Adachi LK, Masahiro K, Yoshida H, Shinkai RS, Neto PT, et al. Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30:409. PMid:20664843