Beltrami IM, de Lima CC, do Nascimento CT, Gonçalves JGP, Azarias JS, Bortoleto ALF, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM. Hybrid Ceramics Cementation Protocols: Scope Review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(9):e1138-50.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.61733

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61733

_____

 

References

1. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(2):161-7.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-159
PMid:25736259

 

2. Bayazıt EÖ. Repair of aged polymer-based CAD/CAM ceramics treated with different bonding protocols. Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34(3):357-364.
https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6660
PMid:33750995

 

3. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, Krämer N, Reich S, Braun A, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(1):9-20.

 

4. Motevasselian F, Amiri Z, Chiniforush N, Mirzaei M, Thompson V. In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatments of a Hybrid Ceramic on the Microtensile BondStrength to a Fighting Resin Cement. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019;10(4):297-303.
https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2019.48
PMid:31875122 PMCid:PMC6885908

 

5. Piemjai M, Donpinprai C. Improving retention of dental veneers fabricated from an experimental enamel-based biopolymer compared with CAD/CAM hybrid materials. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e16219.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16219
PMid:37215792 PMCid:PMC10199219

 

6. Ustun S, Ayaz EA. Effect of different cement systems and aging on the bond strength of chairside CAD-CAM ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(2):334-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.025
PMid:32122650

 

7. Bottino MA, Campos F, Ramos NC, Rippe MP, Valandro LF, Melo RM. Inlays made from a hybrid material: adaptation and bond strengths. Opera Dent. 2015;40(3):E83-91.
https://doi.org/10.2341/13-343-L
PMid:25405903

 

8. Campos F, Almeida CS, Rippe MP, de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Resin Bonding to a Hybrid Ceramic: Effects of Surface Treatments and Aging. Opera Dent. 2016;41(2):171-8.
https://doi.org/10.2341/15-057-L
PMid:26266652

 

9. Tribst JP, Diamantino PJ, de Freitas MR, Tanaka IV, Silva-Concílio LR, de Melo RM, et al. Effect of active application of self-etching ceramic primer on the long-term bond strength of different dental CAD/CAM materials. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(11):1089-1095.
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58723
PMid:34824694 PMCid:PMC8601693

 

10. Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M. The effect of sandblasting duration on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM resin restoratives. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10(3):211-217.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.211
PMid:29930791 PMCid:PMC6004352

 

11. Donmez MB, Okutan Y, Yucel MT. Effect of prolonged application of single-step self-etching primer and hydrofluoric acid on the surface roughness and shear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 2020;128(6):542-549.
https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12747
PMid:33247878

 

12. El-Damanhoury HM, A Elsahn N, Sheela S, Gaintantzopoulou MD. Adhesive luting to hybrid ceramic and resin composite CAD/CAM Blocks:Er:YAG Laser versus chemical etching and micro-abrasion pretreatment. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65(2):225-234.
https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2020_50
PMid:32981912

 

13. Avram LT, Galațanu SV, Opriș C, Pop C, Jivănescu A. Effect of Different Etching Times with Hydrofluoric Acid on the Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Ceramic Material. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(20):7071.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207071
PMid:36295139 PMCid:PMC9605186

 

14. Barutcigil K, Barutcigil Ç, Kul E, Özarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to a CAD/CAM RestorativeMaterial. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):71-78.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12574
PMid:27880028

 

15. Fathy H, Hamama, HH, El-Wassefy N, Mahmoud SH. Effect of different surface treatments on resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics bonding to dentin: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health.2022;22:635.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02674-5
PMid:36564766 PMCid:PMC9789622

 

16. Çelik E, Sahin SC, Dede DÖ. Shear Bond Strength of Nanohybrid Composite to the Resin Matrix Ceramics After Different Surface Treatments. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36(8):424-430.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2018.4467
PMid:30020854

 

17. Peumans M, Valjakova EB, De Munck J, Mishevska CB, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):289-302.

 

18. Awad, MM., Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A, Khan R, Silikas N, Hatamleh MM, et al. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):178.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0865-7
PMid:31387557 PMCid:PMC6685274

 

19. Castro EF, Azevedo VLB, Nima G, Andrade OS, Dias CTDS, Giannini M. Adhesion, Mechanical Properties, and Microstructure of Resin-matrix CAD-CAM Ceramics. J Adhes Dent.2020;22(4):421-431.

 

20. Dhesi GS, Sidhu S, Al-Haj Husain N, Özcan M. Evaluation of Adhesion Protocol for Titanium Base Abutments to Different Ceramic and Hybrid Materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2021;29(1):22-34.

 

21. Beyabanaki E, Eftekhar Ashtiani R, Feyzi M, Zandinejad A. Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Four Different CAD-CAM Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Materials after hermocycling. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(7):623-628.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13469
PMid:34890485

 

22. Jassim SJ, Majeed MA. Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/ CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study). Heliyon. 2023;9(7):e17790.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17790
PMid:37449108 PMCid:PMC10336531

 

23. Dogan I, Karaman E. How the repair bonding strength of hybrid ceramic CAD/CAM blocks is influenced by the use of surface treatments and universal adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2024;43(2):312-319.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2023-237
PMid:38432950

 

24. Nafisifard M, Alaghehmand H, Soleimani L, Mokhtarpour F. Effect of 4-META on microtensile bond strength of cements to ceramics. Dent Res J. 2024;21:19.
https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_764_22