Llancari-Alonzo
P, Alvítez-Temoche D, Ladera-Castañeda M, Castro-Ramirez L, López-Gurreonero C,
Cayo-Rojas C. Fluoride release and flexural strength of four ion-releasing
restorative materials: An in vitro comparative study. J Clin Exp Dent.
2024;16(10):e1207-16.
doi:10.4317/jced.61818
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61818
_____
References
|
1.
Cayo-Rojas CF, Gerónimo-Nieto EC, Aliaga-Mariñas AS. Salivary pH changes
caused by cariogenic and non-cariogenic food intake in preschoolers from
Huaura, Peru. Rev Cuba Estomatol 2021;58(4):e3518. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Pitts NB, Twetman S, Fisher J, Marsh PD. Understanding dental caries as a
non-communicable disease. Br Dent J. 2021; 231(12):749-753. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Saha S, Chopra A, Kamath SU, Kashyap NN. Can acid produced from probiotic
bacteria alter the surface roughness, microhardness, and elemental
composition of enamel? An in vitro study. Odontology. 2023; 111(4):929-941. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Cayo-Rojas CF, Santillán-Espadín KR, Nicho-Valladares MK, Ladera-Castañeda
MI, Aliaga-Mariñas AS, Cervantes-Ganoza LA. Knowledge about oral health,
salivary PH, body mass index and its relationship with dental caries in
preschool children. Rev. Fac. Med. 2021;69(4):e88709. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Allen-Revoredo C, Ladera-Castañeda M, Córdova-Limaylla N, Briceño-Vergel G,
Cervantes-Ganoza L, Cayo-Rojas C. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Oral
Health Prevention Associated with Sociodemographic Factors of Adolescent
Students from a Peruvian-Swiss Educational Institution. J Int Oral Health.
2022;14(5):475-486. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
BaniHani, A., Santamaría, R. M., Hu, S., Maden, M., y Albadri, S. Minimal
intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary
teeth: an umbrella review. European archives of paediatric dentistry:
official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022;23(5):
667-693. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Leal SC, Dame-Teixeira N, Barbosa CB, Kominami PAA, Raposo F, Nakagawa EMT,
Banerjee A. Minimum intervention oral care: defining the future of caries
management. Braz Oral Res. 2022; 36:e135. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Giacaman, R., Muñoz-Sandoval, C., Neuhaus, K. W., Fontana, M., y Chałas, R.
Evidence-based strategies for the minimally invasive treatment of carious
lesions: Review of the literature. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018; 27(7):
1009-1016. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Featherstone JDB, Crystal YO, Alston P, Chaffee BW, Doméjean S, Rechmann P,
Zhan L, Ramos-Gomez F. Evidence-Based Caries Management for All
Ages-Practical Guidelines. Front Oral Health. 2021; 2:657518. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Innes N, Chu C, Fontana M, Lo E, Thomson W, Uribe S, et al. A Century of
Change towards Prevention and Minimal Intervention in Cariology. J. Dent.
Res. 2019;98(6):611-617. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Gaviria-Martinez A, Castro-Ramirez L, Ladera-Castañeda M, Cervantes-Ganoza L,
Cachay-Criado H, Alvino-Vales M, et al. Surface roughness and oxygen
inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin
composites with and without polishing: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health.
2022;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02297-w. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Cayo C, Llancari L, Mendoza R, Cervantes L. Marginal filling and adhesive resistance
of bulk fill resin applying 18% edta gel compared with 37% phosphoric acid
gel in vitro dental conditioning. J Oral Res. 2019;8(3):228-35. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2019.034. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Calatrava, L. Bioactive restorative materials. relevance and challenges. Acta
Odontol. Venezolana. 2020;58(1):1-20. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Ferracane J, Sidhu S, Melo MA, Yeo I, Diogenes A, Darvell B. Bioactive dental
materials Developing, promising, confusing. JADA Foundational Science.
2023;2:100022. Doi: 10.1016/j.jfscie.2023.100022 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Vandana S, Chitharanjan S, Mithra N.H, y Gowrish S.B. Alkasite Restorative
Material: Flexural and Compressive Strength Evaluation. Res J Pharm Biol Chem
Sci. 2018;9(5):2179. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Mirchandani B, Padunglappisit C, Toneluck A, Naruphontjirakul P, Panpisut P.
Effects of Sr/F-Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles and Calcium Phosphate on
Monomer Conversion, Biaxial Flexural Strength, Surface Microhardness,
Mass/Volume Changes, and Color Stability of Dual-Cured Dental Composites for
Core Build-Up Materials. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(11):1897. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Ibrahim MS, Alabbas MS, Alsomaly KU, AlMansour AA, Aljouie AA, Alzahrani MM,
Asseri AA, AlHumaid J. Flexural Strength, Elastic Modulus and Remineralizing
Abilities of Bioactive Resin-Based Dental Sealants. Polymers (Basel). 2021;
14(1):61. Doi: 10.3390/polym14010061. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Cedillo, J, Domínguez, A, Espinosa, R. Bioactive materials in restorative
dentistry. RODYB. 2021;10 (3):19-29. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
François P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal JP, Dursun E. Flexural
properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill
materials. J Oral Sci. 2021; 63(2):139-144. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Ozaslan S, Celiksoz O, Tepe H, Tavas B, Yaman BC. A Comparative Study of the
Repair Bond Strength of New Self-Adhesive Restorative Materials With a Resin
Composite Material. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e44309. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Kurinji Amalavathy R, Sahoo HS, Shivanna S, Lingaraj J, Aravinthan S.
Staining effect of various beverages on and surface nano-hardness of a resin
coated and a non-coated fluoride releasing tooth-coloured restorative
material: An in-vitro study. Heliyon. 2020;6(6):e04345. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS guidelines (checklist for
reporting in-vitro studies): a concept note on the need for standardized
guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro
studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17:301-304. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Keerthana B, Ganesh SB, Jayalakshmi S. Evaluation of flexural strength of
glass ionomer cement after immersion in fruit juices. J Adv Pharm Technol
Res. 2022;13(Suppl 1):S156-S159. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Reddy TH, Venkatesh KV, Mani R. Comparative evaluation of three different
glass ionomer cements. Indian J Dent Res. 2021; 32:485-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Kirthika N, Vidhya S, Sujatha V, Mahalaxmi S, Senthil Kumar R. Comparative
evaluation of compressive and flexural strength, fluoride release and
bacterial adhesion of GIC modified with CPP-ACP, bioactive glass, chitosan
and MDPB. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1):16-21. doi:
10.34172/joddd.2021.004. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Dasgupta S, Saraswathi MV, Somayaji K, Pentapati KC, Shetty P. Comparative
evaluation of fluoride release and recharge potential of novel and
traditional fluoride-releasing restorative materials: An in vitro study. J
Conserv Dent. 201; 21(6):622-626. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Morales-Valenzuela AA, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Lara-Carrillo E, Garcia-Contreras
R, Hegazy-Hassan W, Toral-Rizo VH, et al. Enhancement of fluoride release in
glass ionomer cements modified with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Medicine
(Baltimore). 2022;101(44):e31434. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Rifai H, Qasim S, Mahdi S, Lambert MJ, Zarazir R, Amenta F, et al. In-vitro
evaluation of the shear bond strength and fluoride release of a new bioactive
dental composite material. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022; 14(1): e55-e63. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Krajangta N, Dulsamphan C, Chotitanmapong T. Effects of Protective Surface
Coating on Fluoride Release and Recharge of Recent Uncoated High-Viscosity
Glass Ionomer Cement. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10(12):233. |
|
|
|
|
|
30.
Wongphattarakul S, Kuson R, Sastraruji T, Suttiat K. Fluoride Release and
Rechargeability of Poly (lactic acid) Composites with Glass Ionomer Cement.
Polymers. 2023;15(20):4041. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15204041 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.
Banic-Vidal LS, Veček NN, Šalinović I, Miletić I, Klarić E, Jukić-Krmek S.
Short-Term Fluoride Release from Ion- Releasing Dental Materials. Acta
Stomatol Croat. 2023; 57(3):229-237. doi: 10.15644/asc57/3/3. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.
Upadhyay S, Rao A, Shenoy R. Comparison of the amount of fluoride release
from nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer, conventional and resin modified
glass ionomer cements. J Dent (Tehran). 2013;10(2):134-40. |
|
|
|
|
|
33.
Battula MS, Kaushik M, Mehra N, Raj V. A comparative evaluation of fracture
toughness, flexural strength, and acid buffer capability of a bulk-fill
alkasite with high-strength glass-ionomer cement: An in vitro study. Dent Res
J (Isfahan). 2022;19:90. |
|
|
|
|
|
34.
Balagopal S, Nekkanti S, Kaur K. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical
Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling
Material. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021; 22(2):134-139. |
|
|
|
|
|
35.
Hiremath G, Horati P, Naik B. Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength
of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite - An in
vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2022; 25(3):288-291. |
|
|
|
|
|
36.
Adsul PS, Dhawan P, Tuli A, Khanduri N, Singh A. Evaluation and Comparison of
Physical Properties of Cention N with Other Restorative Materials in
Artificial Saliva: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent.
2022;15(3):350-355. |
|
|
|
|
|
37.
Marovic D, Par M, Posavec K, Marić I, Štajdohar D, Muradbegović A, Tauböck
TT, Attin T, Tarle Z. Long-Term Assessment of Contemporary Ion-Releasing
Restorative Dental Materials. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(12):4042. |
|
|
|
|
|
38.
Moshaverinia M, Navas A, Jahedmanesh N, Shah KC, Moshaverinia A, Ansari S.
Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass
ionomer dental restorative material. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 122(2):154-159. |
|
|
|
|
|
39.
Gomes de Araújo-Neto V., Sebold M., Fernandes de Castro E., Feitosa V.P.,
Giannini M. Evaluation of physico-mechanical properties and filler particles
characterization of conventional, bulk-fill, and bioactive resin-based
composites. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021; 115: 104288. |
|
|
|
|
|
40.
Aldhafyan M., Silikas N., Watts D.C. Influence of curing modes on conversion
and shrinkage of dual-cure resin-cements. Dent. Mater. 2022; 38:194-203. |
|
|
|
|
|
41.
Ugurlu M. Effects of surface coating on the flexural strength of fluoride
releasing restorative materials after water aging for one year. Eur Oral Res.
2020; 54(2):62-68. |
|
|
|
|
|
42.
Harhash AY, ElSayad II, Zaghloul AGS. A comparative in vitro study on
fluoride release and water sorption of different flowable esthetic
restorative materials. Eur J Dent. 2017; 11(2):174-179. |
|
|
|
|
|
43.
Dhumal RS, Chauhan RS, Patil V, Rathi N, Nene K, Tirupathi SP, Patil L,
Nankar MY, Khandelwal AP. Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release from
Four Commercially Available Pediatric Dental Restorative Materials. Int J
Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023; 16(Suppl 1): S6-S12. |
|
|
|
|
|
44.
Kelić K, Par M, Peroš K, Šutej I, Tarle Z. Fluoride-Releasing Restorative
Materials: The Effect of a Resinous Coat on Ion Release. Acta Stomatol Croat.
2020;54(4):371-381. |
|
|
|
|
|
45.
Feiz A, Nicoo MA, Parastesh A, Jafari N, Sarfaraz D. Comparison of
antibacterial activity and fluoride release in tooth-colored restorative
materials: Resin-modified glass ionomer, zirconomer, giomer, and cention N.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022;19(1):104. |
|
|
|
|
|
46.
Alacote-Mauricio B, Gihuaña-Aguilar C, Castro-Ramirez L, Cervantes-Ganoza L,
Ladera-Castañeda M, Dapello-Zevallos G, et al. Color stability in a giomer, a
conventional glass ionomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer exposed to
different pigment beverages: An in vitro comparative study. J Int Oral Health
2023;15:357-66. |
|