Yahya MA, Selléus M, Mahmood DJH, Braian M, Larsson C. The effect of different scanning protocols on precision and trueness of intraoral scanning: A pilot trialy. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(10):e1299-306.

doi:10.4317/jced.62158

_____

References

1. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(4):1201-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0

2. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043312

3. Ajioka H, Kihara H, Odaira C, Kobayashi T, Kondo H. Examination of the Position Accuracy of Implant Abutments Reproduced by Intra-Oral Optical Impression. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164048

4. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(6):1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y

5. Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12 Suppl 1:e63-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x

6. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(4):853-62. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3343

7. Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145(6):542-51. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.23

8. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(4):466-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01027.x

9. Standardization TIOf. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions: ISO; 2023 [Available from: Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5725:-1:ed-2:v1:en.

10. Pesce P, Pera F, Setti P, Menini M. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(2):171-5. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5535

11. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(2):121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1

12. Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16(1):11-21.

13. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent. 2005;8(4):283-94.

14. Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018;26(3):101-21.

15. Tan MY, Yee SHX, Wong KM, Tan YH, Tan KBC. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(2):366-80. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6855

16. Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):107-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13135

17. Miyoshi K, Tanaka S, Yokoyama S, Sanda M, Baba K. Effects of different types of intraoral scanners and scanning ranges on the precision of digital implant impressions in edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(1):74-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13548

18. Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527

19. Resende CCD, Barbosa TAQ, Moura GF, Tavares LDN, Rizzante FAP, George FM, et al. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(2):294-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.011

20. Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(6):648-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12853

21. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17 Suppl 1:e54-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12124

22. Mutwalli H, Braian M, Mahmood D, Larsson C. Trueness and Precision of Three-Dimensional Digitizing Intraoral Devices. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:5189761. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5189761

23. Ribeiro P, Herrero-Climent M, Díaz-Castro C, Ríos-Santos JV, Padrós R, Mur JG, et al. Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions-An In Vitro Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081599

24. Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):465-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12567

25. Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(11):1360-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12994

26. Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Nasirpour A, Hasanzade M. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:3761750. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3761750

27. Abdel-Azim T, Zandinejad A, Elathamna E, Lin W, Morton D. The influence of digital fabrication options on the accuracy of dental implant-based single units and complete-arch frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(6):1281-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3577

28. Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1253-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2217-9

29. Pera F, Pesce P, Bagnasco F, Pancini N, Carossa M, Baldelli L, et al. Comparison of Milled Full-Arch Implant-Supported Frameworks Realised with a Full Digital Workflow or from Conventional Impression: A Clinical Study. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020833

30. Marques S, Ribeiro P, Falcão C, Lemos BF, Ríos-Carrasco B, Ríos-Santos JV, et al. Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031020

31. Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE. Tolerance measurements of various implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(3):371-5.

32. Braian M, De Bruyn H, Fransson H, Christersson C, Wennerberg A. Tolerance measurements on internal- and external-hexagon implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(4):846-52. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3242

33. Jemt T, Lindén B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7(1):40-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199200140-00014

34. Arakida T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Suzuki T, Minakuchi S. Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62(3):324-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.005

35. Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M, et al. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(3):372-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003

36. Revilla-León M, Gohil A, Barmak AB, Gómez-Polo M, Pérez-Barquero JA, Att W, et al. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(5):755-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.012

37. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Triangulation Technology With Blue Light for Implants: Effect of Clinically Relevant Parameters. Implant Dent. 2015;24(5):498-504. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000283