Tran NC, Nguyen
NDM, Huynh NCN, Tran TTN, Hoang HT, Wang DH, Hsu ML. Influence of composite
resin core buildup translucency on the accuracy of an anterior CAD-CAM bridge
fabricated with a digital impression. J Clin
Exp Dent. 2025;17(4):e366-73.
doi:10.4317/jced.62249
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62249
___
References
|
1. Vecsei B, Czigola
A, Róth I, Hermann P, Borbély J. Digital impression systems, CAD/CAM, and STL
file. 2021;27-63. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Birnbaum NS,
Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes
reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008;29(8):494,496,498-505. PMID: 18935788 |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Ender A, Mehl A.
Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision. J
Vis Exp. 2014:(86):51374. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Pereira ALC,
Curinga MRS, Segundo HVM, Carreiro AFP. Factors that influence the accuracy
of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple
implants: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(6):855-862. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Revilla-León M,
Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Clinical Study of the Influence of
Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of
an Intraoral Scanner. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):107-113. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Kurz M, Attin T,
Mehl A. Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free
3D measuring system. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(8):2035-43. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Nguyen NDM, Tran
NC, Tran TTN, Huynh NCN, Nguyen KD, Hoang HT, et al. Effects of core buildup
composite resin translucency on intraoral scanner accuracy: an in vitro
study. Int J Comput Dent. 2023;26(3):201-210. PMid:36625373 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Kalantari MH,
Abbasi B, Giti R, Rastegar Z, Tavanafar S, Shahsavari-Pour S. Clinical
evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia
three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional
polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):52. |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Atlas A, Isleem W,
Bergler M, Fraiman HP, Walter R, Lawson ND. Factors Affecting the Marginal
Fit of CAD-CAM Restorations and Concepts to Improve Outcomes. 2019;6:277-283. |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Amornvit P, Rokaya
D, Sanohkan S. Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners.
Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:2673040. |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Diker B, Tak O.
Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect
of scanning sequence. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(5):299-306. |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Nedelcu R, Olsson
P, Nyström I, Rydén J, Thor A. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners
and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method. J
Dent. 2018:69:110-118. |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Abduo J, Elseyoufi
M. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing
Factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018;26(3):101-121. PMid:29989757 |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Vafaee F, Mohajeri
M, Mezerji NMG, Zadeh ME. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (precision and
trueness) of eight dental scanners for dental bridge scanning. Dent Res J
(Isfahan). 2021:18:84. |
|
|
|
|
|
15. van der Zel JM,
Vlaar S, de Ruiter WJ, Davidson C. The CICERO system for CAD/CAM fabrication
of full-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(3):261-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. Denissen H, Dozić
A, van der Zel J, van Waas M. Marginal fit and short-term clinical
performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J
Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(5):506-13. |
|
|
|
|
|
17. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer
JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent
J. 1971;131(3):107-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Paul N, Swamy KNR,
Dhakshaini MR, Sowmya S, Ravi MB. Marginal and internal fit evaluation of
conventional metal-ceramic versus zirconia CAD/CAM crowns. J Clin Exp Dent.
2020;12(1):e31-e37. |
|
|
|
|
|
19. Ferrini F, Sannino
G, Chiola C, Capparé P, Gastaldi G, Gherlone EF. Influence of Intra-Oral
Scanner (I.O.S.) on The Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM Single Crowns. Int J
Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(4):544. |
|
|
|
|
|
20. Rizonaki M,
Jacquet W, Bottenberg P, Depla L, Boone M, De Coster PJ. Evaluation of
marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different
finish lines by using a micro-CT technique. J Prosthet Dent.
2022;127(6):890-898. |
|
|
|
|
|
21. Sampaio CS,
Niemann KD, Schweitzer DD, Hirata R, Atria PJ. Microcomputed tomography
evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with
conventional and 3D printed provisional materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(3):487-495. |
|
|
|
|
|
22. Gebril M. The
effect of crown cementation on the marginal fit using a micro-CT measurement
technique. University of British Columbia. 2019. |
|
|
|
|
|
23. Groten M,
Girthofer S, Pröbster L. Marginal fit consistency of copy-milled all-ceramic
crowns during fabrication by light and scanning electron microscopic analysis
in vitro. 1997. 24(12): p. 871-881. |
|
|
|
|
|
24. Al-Imam H, Michou
S, Benetti AR, Gotfredsen K. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of
acrylic bridges using optical coherence tomography. J Oral Rehabil.
2019;46(3):274-281. |
|
|
|
|
|
25. Faruqi S, Ganji
KK, Bandela V, Nagarajappa AK, Mohamed RN, Al Ahmed M, et al. Digital
assessment of marginal accuracy in ceramic crowns fabricated with different
marginal finish line configurations. J Esthet Restor Dent.
2022;34(5):789-795. |
|
|
|
|
|
26. Kızılkaya AR, Kara
AJH. Impact of different CAD software programs on marginal and internal fit
of provisional crowns: An in vitro study. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24205. PMid:38293389
PMCid:PMC10824774 |
|
|
|
|
|
27. Topkara C, Keleş
AJTJPD. Examining the adaptation of modified endocrowns prepared with CAD-CAM
in maxillary and mandibular molars: A microcomputed tomography study. J
Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(5):744-749. |
|
|
|
|
|
28. Blum IR, Özcan M. Reparative
dentistry: possibilities and limitations. Curr Oral Health Rep.
2018;5(4):264-269. |