Cortell-Ballester I, Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Validation of a computer-assisted system on classifying lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jan 1;16 (1):e68-73.  

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.16.e68

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.16.e68

 

 

1. Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Méndez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Somoza-Martin JM, Gándara-Rey JM, García-García A. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:23-6.
doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.004
PMid:16434132

2. García AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:585-587.
doi:10.1054/bjom.2000.0535
PMid:11092770

3. Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40:26-31.
doi:10.1054/bjom.2001.0684
PMid:11883966

4. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1363-71.
doi:10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.214
PMid:15510357

5. Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Evaluation of intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement on classifying lower third molars according to the systems of Pell and Gregory and of Winter. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:893-9.
doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.09.011
PMid:18423277

6. Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Influence of lower third molar position on the incidence of preoperative complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:725-32.
doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.006
PMid:17138172

7. Schmitter M, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B, Hassel A, Wolff D, Rammelsberg P, et al. Assessment of the reliability and validity of panoramic imaging for assessment of mandibular condyle morphology using both MRI and clinical examination as the gold standard. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:220-4.
doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.039
PMid:16876066

8. Araujo MW, Hovey KM, Benedek JR, Grossi SG, Dorn J, Wactawski-Wende J, et al. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement using a constant-force electronic probe: analysis of inter- and intraexaminer variability. J Periodontol. 2003;74:1736-40.
doi:10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1736
PMid:14974813

9. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1303-8.
doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.028
PMid:17577493

10. Raitz R, Correa L, Curi M, Dib L, Fenyo-Pereira M. Conventional and indirect digital radiographic interpretation of oral unilocular radiolucent lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:165-9.
doi:10.1259/dmfr/49307329
PMid:16618849

11. Pecoraro M, Azadivatan-le N, Janal M, Khocht A. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone height on direct digital and conventional radiographs.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:279-84.
doi:10.1259/dmfr/13900561
PMid:16120877