Sadeghi S. Shaping ability of NiTi rotary versus stainless steel hand ins-truments in simulated curved canals Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 May 1;16 (3):e454-8.

doi:10.4317/medoral.16.e454

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.16.e454

1. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995;21:146-51.
doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3

2. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Msd, Seung-Jong L, Chan-Young L. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000;26:719-23.
doi:10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013
PMid:11471641

3. Schäfer E, Lohmann D. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2002;35:505-13.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00513.x
PMid:12190907

4. Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:215-20.
doi:10.1067/moe.2001.114622
PMid:11505270

5. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2006;39:196-202.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x
PMid:16507073

6. Bonaccorso A, Cantatore G, Condorelli GG, Schäfer E, Tripi TR. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod. 2009;35:883-6.
doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.007
PMid:19482191

7. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30:559-67.
doi:10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
PMid:15273636

8. Schäfer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 2. Instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod. 1995;21:493-7.
doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80519-4

9. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36:288-95.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00650.x
PMid:12702124

10. Lentine FN. A study of torsional and angular deflection of endodontic files and reamers. J Endod. 1979;5:181-91.
doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80166-1

11. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975;1:255-62.
doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9

12. Lim KC, Webber J. The effect of root canal preparation on the shape of the curved root canal. Int Endod J. 1985;18:233-9.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00449.x
PMid:3865898

13. Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. Int Endod J. 2000;33:255-61.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00288.x
PMid:11307444

14. Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1999;25:441-5.
doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80275-1

15. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod. 1995;21:173-6.
doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80560-1

16. Martín-Micó M, Forner-Navarro L, Almenar-García A. Modification of the working length after rotary instrumentation: a comparative study of four systems. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:E153-7.