Vosoughhosseini S, Lotfi M, Moradzadeh M, Aghbali A, Rahimi S, Saghiri M, Zand V, Mehdipour M, Ranjkesh B, Doosti S. Comparison of two histopathologic methods for evaluating subcutaneous reaction to mineral trioxide aggregate. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jan 1;17 (1):e41-4.

doi:10.4317/medoral.17309

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17309

1. Cox CF, Sübay RK, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Ostro E. Biocompatibility of various dental materials: pulp healing with a surface seal. Int J PeriodonticsRestorative Dent. 1996;16:240-51.
PMid:9084310

2. Camargo SE, Rode Sde M, do Prado RF, Carvalho YR, Camargo CH. Subcutaneous tissue reaction to castor oil bean and calcium hydroxide in rats. J Appl OralSci. 2010;18:273-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300014
PMid:20857007

3.No authors. Recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials. Fédération Dentaire International, Commission of Dental Materials, Instruments,Equipment and Therapeutics. Int Dent J. 1980;30:140-88.
PMid:6931825

4. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism ofaction. J Endod. 2010;36:400-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.009
PMid:20171353

5. Shahi S, Rahimi S, Lotfi M, Yavari H, Gaderian A. A comparative study of the biocompatibility of three root-end filling materials in rat connective tissue.J Endod. 2006;32:776-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.01.014
PMid:16861081

6. Scarparo RK, Grecca FS, Fachin EV.Analysis of tissue reactions to methacrylate resin-based, epoxy resin-based, and zinc oxide-eugenol endodontic sealers.J Endod. 2009;35:229-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.025
PMid:19166779

7. Garcia Lda F, Marques AA, Roselino Lde M, Pires-de-Souza Fde C, Consani S. Biocompatibility evaluation of Epiphany/Resilon root canal filling system insubcutaneous tissue of rats. J Endod. 2010;36:110-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.012
PMid:20003946

8. Costa CA, Teixeira HM, do Nascimento AB, Hebling J. Biocompatibility of two current adhesive resins. J Endod. 2000;26:512-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200009000-00006

9. Scarparo RK, Haddad D, Acasigua GA, Fossati AC, Fachin EV, Grecca FS. Mineral trioxide aggregate-based sealer: analysis of tissue reactions to a new endodontic material. J Endod. 2010;36:1174-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.031
PMid:20630293

10. Kim JS, Baek SH, Bae KS. In vivo study on the biocompatibility of newly developed calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers. J Endod. 2004;30:708-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000125318.90702.01
PMid:15448464

11. Vosoughhosseini S, Lotfi M, Shahi S, Baloo H, Mesgariabbasi M, Saghiri MA, et al. Influence of white versus gray mineral trioxideaggregate on inflammatory cells. J Endod. 2008;34:715-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.005
PMid:18498897

12. Lotfi M, Vosoughhosseini S, Saghiri MA, Mesgariabbasi M, Ranjkesh B. Effect of white mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with disodium hydrogen phosphate on inflammatory cells. J Endod. 2009;35:703-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.013
PMid:19410087

13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529310
PMid:843571

14. Camilleri J, Pitt Ford TR. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of the constituents and biological properties of the material. Int Endod J. 2006;39:747-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01135.x
PMid:16948659

15. Torneck CD. Reaction of rat connective tissue to polyethylene tube implants. I. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966;21:379-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(66)90077-6

16. Olsson B, Sliwkowski A, Langeland K. Subcutaneous implantation for thebiological evaluation of endodontic materials. J Endod. 1981;7:355-67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80057-X