Roshan NM, Sakeenabi
B. Survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary
molars placed in school environment and hospital dental setup- one year follow-up
study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Nov 1;16
(7):e973-7.
doi:10.4317/medoral.17327
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17327
1. Smales RJ, Yip HK. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for primary
teeth: review of literature. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:294-8.
PMid:10969434
2. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan
Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic
restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56:135-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02423.x
PMid:8915958
3. Carvalho TS, Ribeiro TR,
Bönecker M, Pinheiro EC, Colares V. The atraumatic
restorative treatment approach: an “atraumatic” alternative.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:e668-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.14.e668
4. Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE. Atraumatic
perspectives of ART: psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with
and without rotary instruments. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31:15-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00021.x
PMid:12542428
5. Mjör IA, Gordan VV. A review of atraumatic restorative
treatment (ART). Int Dent J. 1999;49:127-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.1999.tb00896.x
6. Honkala S, Honkala E. Atraumatic dental
treatment among Finnish elderly persons. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:435-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00903.x
PMid:12028490
7. Honkala
E, Behbehani J, Ibricevic
H, Kerosuo E, Al-Jame G. The atraumatic restorative treatment
(ART) approach to restoring primary teeth in a standard dental clinic. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;13:172-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00455.x
PMid:12752916
8. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal
intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J. 2000;50:1-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x
PMid:10945174
9. Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer
cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr
Dent. 2002;24:423-9.
PMid:12412956
10. Hume WR, Mount GJ. In vitro
studies on the potential for pulpal cytotoxicity of glass-ionomer
cements. J Dent Res. 1988;67:915-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670060501
PMid:3170904
11. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers
and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials.
1998;19:503-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00130-0
12. Duque C, Negrini Tde C, Hebling J, Spolidorio DM. Inhibitory activity of glass-ionomer cements on cariogenic
bacteria. Oper Dent. 2005;30:636-40.
PMid:16268399
13. Smales RJ, Gao
W. In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach. J
Dent. 2000;28:249-56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00071-8
14. Donly KJ, Nelson JJ. Fluoride release of restorative materials
exposed to a fluoridated dentifrice. ASDC J Dent Child.
1997;64:249-50.
PMid:9328674
15. Marinelli CB, Donly KJ,
Wefel JS, Jakobsen JR, Denehy GE. An in vitro comparison of
three fluoride regimens on enamel remineralization.
Caries Res. 1997;31:418-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000262432
PMid:9353580
16. Taifour D, Frencken JE,
Beiruti N, van ‘t Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer
(ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3
years. Caries Res. 2002;36:437-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000066531
PMid:12459617
17. Taifour D, Frencken JE,
Beiruti N, van’t Hof MA, Truin GJ, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Comparison between restorations in the
permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after
3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.
2003;31:122-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00027.x
PMid:12641593
18. Frencken JE, Taifour D,
van ‘t Hof MA. Survival of ART and
amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years. J
Dent Res. 2006;85:622-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500708
PMid:16798862
19. Frencken JE, van’t Hof
MA, Taifour D, Al-Zaher I.
Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring
single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school
children after 6.3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35:207-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00322.x
PMid:17518967
20. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan
Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE. Atraumatic
restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in
Thailand--survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56:141-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02424.x
PMid:8915959
21. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz E.
Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res. 1998;32:119-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000016441
PMid:9544860
22. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer
sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent
Oral Epidemiol. 1998;26:372-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01975.x
PMid:9870536
23. Menezes JP, Rosenblatt A, Medeiros E. Clinical
evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary
molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
J Dent Child (Chic). 2006;73:91-7.
24. Lo EC, Holmgren CJ. Provision of Atraumatic
Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children--a
30-month evaluation. Int J Paediatr
Dent. 2001;11:3-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263x.2001.00232.x
PMid:11309870
25. Lo EC, Holmgren CJ, Hu D, van Palenstein
Helderman W. Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in
Chinese school children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35:387-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00342.x
PMid:17822487
26. Frencken JE, Songpaisan
Y, Phantumvanit P, Pilot T. An atraumatic
restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. Int Dent J. 1994;44:460-4.
PMid:7814116
27. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM. Comparison of atraumatic
restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Quintessence Int. 2002;33:17-21.
PMid:11887531
28. Ersin NK, Candan U, Aykut A, Onçağ O, Eronat C, Kose T. A clinical
evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer
cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at
24 months. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1529-36.
PMid:17082278
29. Holmgren CJ, Lo EC, Hu D, Wan H. ART restorations
and sealants placed in Chinese school children--results after three years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.
2000;28:314-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280410.x
PMid:10901411
30. Van Gemert-Schriks MC, van Amerongen
WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IH. Three-year survival of
single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population.
Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:337-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0138-8
PMid:17710452 PMCid:2099161