Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17 (4):e678-88.

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.17721

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17721

 

 

1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558-64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300050586
PMid:9866761

2. Quintero JC, Trosien A, Hatcher D, Kapila S. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics: Historical perspective, current status, and future developements. Angle Orthod 1999;69:491-506.
PMid:10593439

3. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:640.e1-5.

4. Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:559-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.009
PMid:19168378

5. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:609-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028
PMid:19464146

6. Cattaneo PM, Melsen B. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic. World J Orthod. 2008;9:269-82.
PMid:18834009

7. Lou L, Lagravère MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:402-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.015
PMid:17709072

8. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:212-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.072
PMid:15660095

9. Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, Lee KJ, Baik HS. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:600.e23-34.

10. Muramatsu A, Nawa H, Kimura M, Yoshida K, Maeda M, Katsumata A et al.
Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse metod. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:396-402.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/040207-166.1
PMid:18416622

11. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radio.l 2006;35:410-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/20987648
PMid:17082331

12. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:551-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.021
PMid:17613260

13. Moerenhout BA, Gelaude F, Swennen GR, Casselman JW, Van Der Sloten J, Mommaerts MY. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37:18-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006
PMid:18815053

14. Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:112-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024
PMid:18617110

15. Lagravère MO, Low C, Flores-Mir C, Chung R, Carey JP, Heo G et al. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:598-604.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.018
PMid:20451778

16. Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:263-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq144
PMid:21385857

17.
Delamare EL, Liedke GS, Vizzotto MB, da Silveira HL, Ribeiro JL, Silveira HE. Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:414-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/31924248
PMid:20841459

18. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:80-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/31349994
PMid:18239035

19. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:387-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/122106-52.1
PMid:18416632

20. De Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107:256-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.039
PMid:18718796    PMCid:2642991

21. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:150–7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/122407-599.1
PMid:19123719

22. Lagravère MO, Gordon JM, Guedes IH, Flores-Mir C, Carey JP, Heo G, Major PW.Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:1047-56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/010509-10R.1
PMid:19852593

23. Van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:156-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.017
PMid:20044238

24. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007;36:263-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/98032356
PMid:17586852