Alió-Sanz JJ, Kato E,
Lorenzo-Pernía J, Iglesias-Conde C, Iglesias-Linares
A, Solano-Reina E. Study of mandibular growth in patients treated with Fränkel´s
functional regulator (1b). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Sep 1;17 (5):e884-92.
doi:10.4317/medoral.17958
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17958
1. Fränkel R. The theoretical concept underlying the treatment with function
correctors. Rep Congr Eur
Orthod Soc. 1966;42:233-54.
PMid:5233245
2. McNamara JA Jr. JCO interviews Dr. James A. McNamara, Jr. on the Frankel
appliance. Part 1--Biological basis and appliance design. J Clin Orthod. 1982;16:520-37.
PMid:6960013
3. Fränkel R. The treatment of
Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with functional correctors. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:265-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90106-7
4. Rushforth CD, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Skeletal and dental changes
following the use of the Frankel functional regulator. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:127-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ortho/26.2.127
5. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U,
Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus function
regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a
randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop.
1998;113:51-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70276-8
6. Rodrigues de Almeida M, Castanha Henriques JF, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Ursi W.
Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in
patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:418-25.
PMid:12401050
7. De Almeida MR, Henriques JF, Ursi
W. Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of class II
malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:458-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.123037
PMid:12045763
8. Owen AH 3rd. Morphologic changes in the sagittal
dimension using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:573-603.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90263-3
9. Perillo L, Cannavale R, Ferro F, Franchi L, Masucci C, Chiodini P, et al.
Meta-analysis of skeletal mandibular changes during
Frankel appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:84-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq033
PMid:20639280
10. Nielsen IL. Facial growth during treatment with the
function regulator appliance. Am J Orthod.
1984;85:401-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90161-1
11. Remmer KR, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS, Way DC.
Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using
the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed
appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:363-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90063-6
12. Gianelly AA, Arena SA, Bernstein L. A comparison of Class II
treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise, and Fränkel
appliances. Am J Orthod.
1984;86:269-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90137-4
13. Falck F, Fränkel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:333-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90353-3
14. Fränkel R. Concerning recent articles on Fränkel
appliance therapy. Am J Orthod.
1984;85:441-7.
PMid:6586085
15. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG.
Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II
patients. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:91-110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90233-7
16. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in
the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:134-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70007-Y
17. Righellis EG. Treatment effects of Fränkel,
activator and extraoral traction appliances. Angle Orthod. 1983;53:107-21.
PMid:6576650
18. Alió JJ, Lorenzo J, Iglesias C. Cranial base
growth in Down’s Syndrome patients. A
longitudinal study. Am. J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop.
2008;133:729-37.
PMid:18456147
19. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel
and Edgewise appliances. Angle Orthod.
1985;55:281-98.
PMid:3865566
20. Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects
produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 1999;116:597-609.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70193-9
21. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation.
Am J Orthod. 1984;86:449-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90352-X
22. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes
during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:153-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81005-4
23. Creekmore TD, Radney LJ. Fränkel appliance
therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic? Am J Orthod.
1983;83:89-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(83)90294-4
24. Chadwick SM, Aird
JC, Taylor PJ, Bearn DR. Functional regulator treatment of Class II division 1
malocclusions. Eur J Orthod.
2001;23:495-505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.5.495
25. Hamilton SD, Sinclair PM, Hamilton
RH. A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:427-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90264-2
26. Janson GR, Toruño JL, Martins DR, Henriques
JF, de Freitas MR. Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:301-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.3.301
27. Kerr WJ, TenHave TR, McNamara JA Jr. A comparison
of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulators (FR-2 and FR-3). Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:235-42.
PMid:2792213
28. Schulhof RJ, Engel GA. Results of class II functional appliance treatment.
J Clin Orthod 1982;16:587-99.
PMid:6960016
29. Perillo L, Cannavale R,
Ferro F, Franchi L, Masucci
C, Chiodini P, et al. Meta-analysis of skeletal mandibular changes during Frankel appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:84-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq033
PMid:20639280
30. Courtney M, Harkness M, Herbison
P. Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional
appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:616-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70073-2