Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Gatti S, Gandini P. Disinclusion of unerupted teeth by mean of self-ligating brackets: Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength. Med
Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.
2013 Jan 1;18 (1):e162-7.
doi:10.4317/medoral.18246
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18246
1. Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets:
where are we now? J Orthod. 2003;30:262-73. |
||||
|
||||
2. Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a
randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:470.e1-8. |
||||
|
||||
3. Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and
treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod
Res. 2001;4:220-7. |
||||
|
||||
4. Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment
efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire
size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 2007;131:395-9. |
||||
|
||||
5. Hobson RS, Ledvinka J, Meechan JG. The effect of moisture and blood
contamination on bond strength of a new orthodontic bonding material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:54-7. |
||||
|
||||
6. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin
RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal
and contaminated conditions. Dent
Mater. 1993;9:295-9. |
||||
|
||||
7. Sayinsu K, Isik
F, Sezen S, Aydemir B.
Light curing the primer-beneficial when working in problem areas? Angle Orthod. 2006;76:310-3. |
||||
|
||||
8. Faltermeier A, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Reicheneder C, Müssig D. An in vitro comparative assessment of different
enamel contaminants during bracket bonding. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:559-63. |
||||
|
||||
9. Sayinsu K, Isik
F, Sezen S, Aydemir
B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on bond strength of brackets
bonded with a protective liquid polish and a light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:391-4. |
||||
|
||||
10. Sfondrini MF, Gatti
S, Scribante A. Effect of blood contamination on
shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and disinclusion
buttons. Br J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2011;49:404-8. |
||||
|
||||
11. Hormati AA, Fuller JL, Denehy GE. Effects of contamination and mechanical
disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:34-8. |
||||
|
||||
12. Jobalia
SB, Valente RM, de Rijk WG, BeGole
EA, Evans CA. Bond strength of visible light-cured glass ionomer
orthodontic cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 1997;112:205-8. |
||||
|
||||
13. Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J. Laboratory evaluation
of a compomer and a resin-modified
glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:58-63. |
||||
|
||||
14. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta
V, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy
C. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded
with conventional and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:357-60. |
||||
|
||||
15. Årtun J, Bergland
S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to
acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-40. |
||||
|
||||
16. Chalgren R, Combe
EC, Wahl AJ. Effects of etchants and primers on shear bond strength of a
self-ligating esthetic orthodontic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:577.e1-5. 17. Northrup RG, Berzins DW,
Bradley TG, Schuckit W. Shear bond strength
comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and self-ligating
and conventional brackets. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:701-6. |
||||
|
||||
18. Sfondrini MF, Gatti
S, Scribante A. Shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:71-4. |
||||
|
||||
19. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini
MF, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy
C. Effects of blood contamination on the shear bond strengths of conventional
and hydrophilic primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:207-12. |
||||
|
||||
20. Nakamichi I, Iwaku
M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possibile
substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1076-81. |
||||
|
||||
21. Vicente A, Toledano M, Bravo LA, Romeo
A, de la Higuera B, Osorio R. Effect of water
contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir
Bucal. 2010;15:e820-6. |
||||
|
||||
22. Sfondrini MF, Scribante
A, Cacciafesta V, Gandini
P. Shear bond strength of deciduous and permanent bovine enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13:227-30. |
||||
|
||||
23. Wegehaupt F, Gries
D, Wiegand A, Attin T. Is
bovine dentine an appropriate substitute for human dentine in
erosion/abrasion tests? J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:390-4. |
||||
|
||||
24. Naujoks R, Schade
H, Zelinka F. Chemical composition of different
areas of the enamel of deciduous and permanent teeth. (The content of Ca, P,
CO2, Na and N2.) Caries Res. 1967;1:137-43. |
||||
|
||||
25. Nelson DG. The influence of carbonate on the atomic structure and
reactivity of hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 1981;60:1621–9. |
||||
|
||||
26. Oesterle LJ, Shellhart
WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:514-9. |
||||
|
||||
27. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL. Shear bond
strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond
Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent.
1994;7:175-9. |
||||
|
||||
28. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Von Wald L.
Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new
collapsible ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:552-9. |
||||
|
||||
29. Mirzakouchaki B, Kimyai
S, Hydari M, Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki-Boroujeni P. Effect of self-etching
primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in
metallic and ceramic brackets. Med
Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e164-70. |
||||
|
||||
30. Oztoprak MO, Isik
F, Sayinsu K, Arun T, Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on
shear bond strength of brackets bonded with 4 adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:238-42. |
||||
|
||||
31. Wilson PR, Beynon AD. Mineralization
differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by
quantitative microradiography. Arch Oral Biol 1989;34:85–8. |
||||
|
||||
32. Tarazona
B, Paredes V, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandía JL. Influence of
first and second premolar extraction or non-extraction treatments on mandibular third molar angulation
and position. A comparative study. Med Oral Patol
Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:e760-6. |