Ozakar-Ilday N, Zorba YO, Yildiz M, Erdem V, Seven N, Demirbuga S. Three-year clinical performance of
two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 May 1;18 (3):e521-8.
doi:10.4317/medoral.18491
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18491
|
1. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial
lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.
Oper Dent. 2003;28:215-35. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
2. Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ. The influence of
the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed
resin composite restorations. Clin
Oral Investig. 2008;12:53-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
3. Khan AM, Satou N, Shintani
H, Taira M, Wakasa K, Yamaki M. Effects of post-curing by heat on the
mechanical properties of visible-light cured inlay composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1993;20:605-14. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
4. Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior
composite resins. Compend Contin
Educ Dent. 2005;26:495-503. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
5. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis
C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi
YA, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization
of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent
Mater. 2003;19:393-8. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
6. Borba M, Della Bona A, Cecchetti D. Flexural strength and hardness of direct and
indirect composites. Braz Oral Res. 2009 ;23:5-10. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
7. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation
laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet
Dent. 1997;9:108-18. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
8. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical
performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass
ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater. 2005;21:262-71. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
9. Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, Canbek K, Gottschalk F, Willershausen
B. Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10:119-25. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
10. Fagundes
TC, Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Cefaly
DF, Jorge MF, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior
composites: 2-year follow-up. Clin Oral Invest.
2006;10:197-203. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
11. Erhardson S, Sheikholeslam
A, Forsberg CM, Lockowandt P. Vertical forces
developed by the jaw elevator muscles during unilateral maximal clenching and
their distribution on teeth and condyles. Swed Dent J. 1993;17:23-34. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
12. Dukic W, Dukic
OL, Milardovic S, Delija
B. Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Composite Restorations at Baseline and 36
Months After Placement. Oper Dent.
2010;35:156-64. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
13. Leirskar J, Nordbo
H, Thoresen NR, Henaug T,
von der Fehr FR. A four to six years follow-up of
indirect resin composite inlays/onlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003;61:247-51. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
14. Manhart J, Neuerer
P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and
indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:289-96. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
15. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. Fourier transform infrared analysis of degree of polymerization in
unfilled resins – methods comparison. J
Dent Res. 1984;63:1093–5 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
16. Thordrup M, Isidor
F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year clinical study of
indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:199-205. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
17. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct
composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year
follow-up. J Dent.
2000;28:375-82. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
18. Terry DA, Touati B. Clinical
considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay
restorations: a review. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001;13:51-8. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
19. Klymus ME, Shinkai
RS, Mota EG, Oshima HM, Spohr AM, Burnett LH. Influence of the mechanical
properties of composites for indirect dental restorations on pattern failure.
Stomatologija. 2007;9:56-60. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
20. Wendt SL Jr, Leinfelder
KF. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year
results. Am J Dent.
1992;5:258-62. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
21. Liberman R, Ben-Amar
A, Herteanu L, Judes H.
Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:26-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
22. Duquia
Rde C, Osinaga PW,
Demarco FF, de V Habecost L, Conceicao
EN. Cervical
microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro
comparison of indirect and direct composite. Oper Dent. 2006;31:682-7. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
23. Soares CJ, Pizi
EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Mechanical properties of light-cured composites
polymerized with several additional post-curing methods. Oper Dent. 2005;30:389-94. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
24. Pires-de-Souza Fde C, Garcia Lda F, Hamida HM, Casemiro LA. Color stability of composites subjected to
accelerated aging after curing using either a halogen or a light emitting
diode source. Braz Dent J. 2007;18:119-23. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
25. Ilie N, Hickel
R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental
composites. Clin Oral Invest. 2009;13:427-38. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
26. Mendonça JS, Neto
RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM. Direct resin composite restorations versus
indirect composite inlays: one-year results. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010;11:025-32. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
27. Cetin AR, Unlu N. Clinical wear rate of
direct and indirect posterior composite resin restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.
2012;32:e87-94 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
28. Pallesen U, Qvist
V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:71-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
29. Barone A, Derchi
G, Rossi A, Marconcini S, Covani
U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: a 3-year
study. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:65-71. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
30. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl
A, Hickel R. Clinical study of indirect composite
resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing preparations placed by dental
students: results after 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years. Quintessence Int. 2010;41:399-410. |
||||