Cantekin K, Sekerci AE, Miloglu O, Buyuk SK. Identification of the mandibular landmarks in a pediatric population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Mar 1;19 (2):e136-41.

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.18980

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18980

 

 

 

1. Hofschneider U, Tepper G, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Assessment of the blood supply to the mental region for reduction of bleeding complications during implant surgery in the interforaminal region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:379-83.

 

2. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, Van Steenberghe D, Sanderink G, Quirynen M. Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26:329-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0242-2

 

3. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, vanSteenberghe D, Gijbels F, Quirynen M. Appearance, location, course, and morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: an assessment on spiral CT scan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:322-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600719

 

4. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Visualisation of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:90-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030207.x

 

5. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:96-103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060205.x

 

6. Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Arensburg B, Taicher S, Kaffe I. Anatomic and radiologic course of the mandibular incisive canal. Surg Radiol Anat. 2000;22:157-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-000-0157-5

 

7. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Moerman P, Lambrichts I, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. Presence and course of the incisive canal in the human mandibular interforaminal region: two-dimensional imaging versus anatomical observations. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25:416-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0152-8

 

8. Makris N, Stamatakis H, Syriopoulos K, Tsiklakis K, van der Stelt PF. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:766-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01903.x

 

9. Lagravere MO, Low C, Flores-Mir C, Chung R, Carey JP, Heo G et al. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:598-604.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.018

 

10. McWilliam JS, Welander U. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks. Angle Orthod. 1978;48:49-56.

 

11. Houston WJ, Maher RE, McElroy D, Sherriff M. Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:149-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/8.3.149

 

12. Jalili MR, Emaeelinejad M, Bayat M, Aghdasi MM. Appearance of anatomical structures of mandible on panoramic radiographs in Iranian population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70:384-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.629625

 

13. Olivier E. The inferior dental nerve and its nerve in the adult. Br Dent J. 1928;49:356-8.

 

14. Haribhakti VV. The dentate adult human mandible: an anatomic basis for surgical decision making. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:536-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199603000-00006

 

15. Denissen HW, Veldhuis HA, van Faassen F. Implant placement in the atrophic mandible: an anatomic study. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:260-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90108-2

 

16. Misch CE, Crawford EA. Predictable mandibular nerve location--a clinical zone of safety. Int J Oral Implantol. 1990;7:37-40.

 

17. Ngeow WC, Dionysius DD, Ishak H, Nambiar P. A radiographic study on the visualization of the anterior loop in dentate subjects of different age groups. J Oral Sci. 2009;51:231-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.231

 

18. Kaya Y, Sencimen M, Sahin S, Okcu KM, Dogan N, Bahcecitapar M. Retrospective radiographic evaluation of the anterior loop of the mental nerve: comparison between panoramic radiography and spiral computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:919-25.

 

19. Uchida Y, Yamashita Y, Goto M, Hanihara T. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1772-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.015

 

20. Bavitz JB, Harn SD, Hansen CA, Lang M. An anatomical study of mental neurovascular bundle-implant relationships. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:563-7.

 

21. Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Arensburg B, Taicher S, Kaffe I. Anterior loop of the mental canal: an anatomical-radiologic study. Implant Dent. 2000;9:120-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009020-00003

 

22. Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:68-72.

 

23. McDonnell D, Reza Nouri M, Todd ME. The mandibular lingual foramen: a consistent arterial foramen in the middle of the mandible. J Anat. 1994;184:363-9.

 

24. Liang X, Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Vandewalle G. Lingual foramina on the mandibular midline revisited: a macroanatomical study. Clin Anat. 2007;20:246-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.20357

 

25. Waitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, Pron GE. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part II. Normal values and growth trends. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:118-28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0118:CSMBOC>2.3.CO;2

 

26. Matteson SR, Bechtold W, Phillips C, Staab EV. A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:1053-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90180-8

 

27. Tyndall DA, Renner JB, Phillips C, Matteson SR. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:1164-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90147-R

 

28. Agrawal JM, Agrawal MS, Nanjannawar LG, Parushetti AD. CBCT in Orthodontics: The Wave of Future. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;14:153-7.

 

29. Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2130-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.021

 

30. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:106-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018

 

31. Isaacson KG, Thom AR, Horner K, Whaites E. Orthodontic Radiographs. Guidelines London. British Orthodontic Society. 2008.