Sierra-Sánchez JL, Martínez-González A, García-Sala Bonmatí F, Mańes-Ferrer JF, Brotons-Oliver A.
Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a
predictable treatment option? A literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Jan 1;19
(1):e74-81.
doi:10.4317/medoral.19306
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.19306
|
1. Summers
R.B. A new concept in maxilary Implant surgery: the
osteotome technique. Compendium1994;15:152-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis
A. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented
with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous
patients. J Clin Periodontol
2002;29 Suppl
3:226-31;discussion 232-33. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation
techniques. J Periodontol
2007;78:377-96. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Scipioni A, Bruschi G.B, Calesini G. The edentulous ridge expansión
technique: a five-year study. Int J Periodont
Rest 1994;14:451-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and
growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and
soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 1989;81:238-49. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. lizarov GA. The tension-stress
effect on the genesis and growth of tissue. Part II. The influence of the
rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop
1989;85:239-63. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in Implant
Dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl
2009;24:237-59. |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Grunder U, Wenz B, Schupbach P. Guided bone regeneration around single-tooth
implants in the esthetic zone: a case series. Int J Periodont
Res 2011;31:613-20. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Esposito M, Grusovin M.G, Felice
P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington H.V, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone
augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2:167-84. |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M.
Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant
dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review.
Clin Oral Impl Res 2009;20:113-23. |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Sohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J. How
successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review. Clin Oral Impl Res 2012;23:515-25. |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Degidi M, Piatelli A, Carinci F. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants:
a retrospective study of 510 implants. J Periodontol 2008;79:49-54. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Galindo-Moreno P, Nilsson P, King P, Becktor J, Speroni S, Schramm A et al. Clinical and radiographic
evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants. 1-year follow-up. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2012;23:609-16. |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piatelli A. Immediate versus
one-stage restoration of small-diameter implants for a single missing
maxillary lateral incisor: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. J. Periodontol 2009;9:1393-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
15. Zembic A, Johannesen L.H, Schou S, Malo P, Reichert T, Farella M et al. Immediately
restored one-piece single-tooth implants with reduced diameter: one-year
results of a multi-center study. Clin. Oral. Impl.
Res 2012;23:49-54. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. Al-Nawas
B, Brägger U, Meijer H.J,
Naert I, Persson R, Perucchi A et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial
(RCT) of titanium-13 zirconium versus titanium grade IV small-diameter bone
level implants in edentulous mandibles - results from a 1-year observation
period Clin. Impl. Dent.
Rel. Res 2012;14:896-904. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Comfort M.B, Chu F.C.S, Chai J, Wat
P.Y.P, Chow T.W. A 5-year prospective study on small diameter screw-shaped
oral implants. J Oral Rehabil
2005;32:341-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Barter
S, Stone P, Brägger U. A
pilot study to evaluate the success and survival rate of titanium-zirconium
implants in partially edentulous patients: results after 24 months of
follow-up. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2012;23:873-81. |
|
|
|
|
|
19. Zinsli B, Sägesser T, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R.
Clinical evaluation of small-diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. Int. J. Oral.
Maxillofac. Impl 2004;19:92-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
20. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piatelli A. Immediate restoration of small-diameter implants
in cases of partial posterior edentulism: a 4-year
case series. J. Periodontol
2009;6:1006-12. |
|
|
|
|
|
21. El-Sheikh
A.M, Shihabuddin O.F, Ghoraba
S.M.F. Two versus three narrow-diameter Implants with locator attachments
supporting mandibular overdentures.
A two-year prospective study. J. Dent 2012. Epub
ahead of print. |
|
|
|
|
|
22. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E, Anello T. Titanium-zirconium
alloy narrow-diameter implants (Straumann Roxolid ®) for the rehabilitation of horizontally
deficient edentulous ridges: prospective study on 18 consecutive patients. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2012;23:1136-41. |
|
|
|
|
|
23. Reddy
M.S, O’Neal J, Haigh S, Aponte-Wesson R, Geurs N.C. Initial clinical efficacy of 3-mm implants
immediately placed into function in conditions of limites
spacing. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Impl
2008;23:281-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
24. Veltri M, Ferrari M, Balleri P.
One-year outcome of narrow diameter blasted implants for rehabilitation of
maxillas with knife-edge resorption. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2008;19:1069-73. |
|
|
|
|
|
25. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Vaccaro F, Russo S. Prosthetic treatment of maxillary
lateral incisor agenesis with osseointegrated
implants: a 24-39 month prospective clinical study. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2006;17:94-101. |
|
|
|
|
|
26. Romeo
E, Lops D, Amorfini L, Chiapasco
M, Chisolfi M, Vogel G. Clinical and radiographic
evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a
longitudinal study. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2006;17:139-48. |
|
|
|
|
|
27. Maló P & de Araújo Nobre M. Implants (3.3 mm diameter) for the
rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: a retrospective clinical
study with up to 11 years of follow-up. Clin.
Implant. Dent. Relat. Res 2011;13:95-103. |
|
|
|
|
|
28. Lee
J.S, Kim H.M, Kim C.S, Choi S.H, Chai J.K, Jung U.W. Long-term retrospective study of
narrow implants for fixed dental prostheses. Clin. Oral. Impl.
Res 2012. Clin. Oral. Impl.
Res 2013;24:847-52. |
|
|
|
|
|
29. Sohn D.S, Bae M.S, Heo J.U, Park J.S, Yea S.H, Romanos
G.E. Retrospective multicenter analysis of immediate provisionalización
using one-piece narrow-diameter (3.0-mm) implants. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac.
Impl 2011;26:163-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
30. Arisan V, Bölükbasi N, Ersanli S, Özdemir T.
Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a
clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clin. Oral. Impl.
Res 2010;21:296-307. |
|
|
|
|
|
31. Franco M, Viscioni
A, Rigo L, Guidi R, Zollino I, Avantaggiato A et
al. Clinical
outcome of narrow diameter implants inserted into allografts.
J. Appl. Oral. Sci 2009;17:301-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
32. Cordaro L, Torsello F, Mirisiola di Torresanto V, Rossini C. Retrospective evaluation of mandibular incisor replacement with narrow neck implants.
Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2006;17:730-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
33. Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom J.L. Tissue alterations at Implant-supported
single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2006;17:165-71. |
|
|
|
|
|
34. Petrie
C.S, Williams J.L. Comparative evaluation of Implant designs: influence of
diameter, length and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A
three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin.
Oral. Impl. Res 2005;16:
486-94. |
|
|
|
|
|
35.
Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2000;11:156-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
36. Allum S.R, Tomlinson R.A, Joshi R. The impact of loads on
standard diameter, small diameter and mini-implants: a comparative laboratory
study. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res 2008;19:553-9. |
|
|
|
|