Gay-Escoda C, Gmez-Santos L, Snchez-Torres A, Herrez-Vilas JM. Effect of the suture technique on postoperative pain, swelling and trismus after removal of lower third molars: A randomized clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 May 1;20 (3):e372-7.

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.20307

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20307

 

 

 

1. Yuasa H, Sugiura M. Clinical postoperative findings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: Prediction of postoperative facial swelling and pain based on preoperative variables. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42:209-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.02.005

 

2. Cerqueira PR, Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV. Comparative study of the effect of a tube drain in impacted lower third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:57-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(03)00675-X

 

3. Waite PD, Cherala S. Surgical outcomes for suture-less surgery in 366 impacted third molar patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:669-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.014

 

4. Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Yanine N, Araya I, Guyatt G. Secondary versus primary closure techniques for the prevention of postoperative complications following removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:441-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.017

 

5. Bello SA, Olaitan AA, Ladeinde AL. A randomized comparison of the effect of partial and total wound closure techniques on postoperative morbidity after mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:24-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.025

 

6. Baqain ZH, Al-Shafii A, Hamdan AA, Sawair FA. Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: A split mouth randomized clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1020-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.011

 

7. Danda AK, Krishna Tatiparthi M, Narayanan V, Siddareddi A. Influence of primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after impacted mandibular third molar removal on postoperative pain and swelling. A comparative and split mouth study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:309-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.060

 

8. Dolanmaz D, Esen A, Isik K, Candirli C. Effect of 2 flap designs on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116:244-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.030

 

9. Hashemi HM, Beshkar M, Aghajani R. The effect of sutureless wound closure on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50:256-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.075

 

10. Osunde OD, Adebola RA, Saheeb BD. A comparative study of the effect of suture-less and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;1:1275-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.009

 

11. Sandhu A, Sandhu S, Kaur T. Comparison of two different flap designs in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:1091-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.07.003

 

12. Maria A, Malik M, Virang P. Comparison of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11:276-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0287-9

 

13. Ordulu M, Aktas I, Yalcin S, Azak AN, Evlioğlu G, Disi R, et al. Comparative study of the effect of tube drainage versus methylprednisolone after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:96-100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.002

 

14. Osunde OD, Saheeb BD, Adebola RA. Comparative study of effect of single and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:971-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.009

 

15. Pasqualini D, Cocero N, Castella A, Mela L, Bracco P. Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:52-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2004.01.023

 

16. Sanchis Bielsa JM, Hernndez-Bazn S, Pe-arrocha Diago M. Flap repositioning versus conventional suturing in third molar surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:E138-42.

 

17. Holland CS, Hindle MO. The influence of closure or dressing of third molar sockets on post-operative swelling and pain. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;22:65-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(84)90011-1

 

18. Rakprasitkul S, Pairuchvej V. Mandibular third molar surgery with primary closure and tube drain. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26:187-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(97)80817-X

 

19. Sağlam AA. Effects of tube drain with primary closure technique on postoperative trismus and swelling after removal of fully impacted mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:143-7.

 

20. de Brabander EC, Cattaneo G. The effect of surgical drain together with a secondary closure technique on postoperative trismus, swelling and pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17:119-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(88)80164-4