Mendoza-Arnau A, Vallecillo-Capilla MF, Cabrerizo-Vlchez M, Rosales-Leal JI. Topographic characterisation of dental implants for commercial use. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Sep 1;21 (5):e631-6.  

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.20333

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20333

 

 

1. Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA. Implant materials, designs and surface topographies: Their effect on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:675-90.

 

2. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmn A. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:659-66.

 

3. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J. The jumping distance revisited: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:35-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x

 

4. Keller JC, Schneider GB, Stanford CM. Effects on implant microtopography on osteoblast cell attachment. Implant Dent. 2003;12:175-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000058309.77613.87

 

5. Szmukler-Moncler S, Testori T, Bernard JP. Etched implants: A comparative surface analysis of four implant systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;69B:46-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.20021

 

6. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxila of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants. 1998;13:611-9.

 

7. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889-902.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708

 

8. Montero J, Bravo M, Guadilla Y, Portillo M, Blanco L, Rojo R, et al. Comparison of Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Zirconia Versus Titanium Implants Placed in Fresh Sockets: A 5-Month Study in Beagles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Feb 11. [Epub ahead of print]
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3668

 

9. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1567-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820291213

 

10. Wennerberg A, Albrektson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009;20:172-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x

 

11. Herbst D, Dullabh H, Sykes L, Vorster C. Evaluation of surface characteristics of titanium and cobalt chromium implant abutment materials. SADJ. 2013;68:350-6.

 

12. Ferraris S, Spriano S, Pan G, Venturello A, Bianchi CL, Chiesa R, et al. Surface modification of Ti-6Al-4V alloy for biomineralization and specific biological response: Part I, inorganic modification. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22:533-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4246-2

 

13. Inzunza D, Covarrubias C, Von Marttens A, Leighton Y, Carvajal JC, Valenzuela F, et al. Synthesis of nanostructured porous silica coatings on titanium and their cell adhesive and osteogenic differentiation properties. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:37-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34673

 

14. An N, Rausch-fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Andrukhov O, Schedle A. Initial attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/viability and gene expression of epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2012;28:1207-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.007

 

15. Abron A, Hopfensperger M, Thompson J, Cooper LF. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.112415

 

16. Dunne CF, Twomey B, O'Neill L, Stanton KT. Co-blasting of titanium surfaces with an abrasive and hydroxyapatite to produce bioactive coatings: Substrate and coating characterisation. J Biom ater Appl. 2014;28:767-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0885328213480534

 

17. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;90:577-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32126

 

18. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Vazquez L, Park YJ, Sammartino G, Bernard JP. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37:525-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00080

 

19. Rosa MB, Albrektsson T, Francischone CE, Filho HO, Wennerberg A. Micrometric characterization of the implant surfaces from the five largest companies in Brazil, the second largest worldwide implant market. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:358-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2791

 

20. Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, Haugen HJ. Titanium implant surface modification by cathodic reduction in hydrofluoric acid: surface characterization and in vivo performance. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;88:581-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31898

 

21. Cao N, Dong J, Wang Q, Ma Q, Wang F, Chen H, et al. Plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on carbon/carbon composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and related tests in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92:1019-27.

 

22. Zinelis S, Thomas A, Syres K, Silikas N, Eliades G. Surface characterization of zirconiza dental implants. Dental materials. 2010;26:295-305.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.079

 

23. An N, Rausch-fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Andrukhov O, Schedle A. Initial attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/viability and gene expression of epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2012;28:1207-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.007

 

24. Blanco J, Alvarez E, Mu-oz F, Li-ares A, Cantalapiedra A. Influence on early osseointegration of dental implants installed with two different drilling protocols: a histomorphometric study in rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:92-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02009.x

 

25. Eisenbarth E, Velten D, Breme J. Effect of surface roughness on cell adhesion. Biomol Eng. 2007;24:27-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeng.2006.05.016

 

26. Pebe P, Barbot R, Trinidad J, Pesquera A, Lucente J, Nishimura R, et al. Counter torque testing and histomorphometric analysis of various implant surfaces in canines: a pilot study. Implant Dentistry. 1997;6:259-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199700640-00002

 

27. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;40:1-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q

 

28. Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA. Bone healing capacity of titaniumplasma-sprayed and hydroxylapatite-coated oralimplants. Clinical Oral Implants Research.1998; 9:261-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090407.x