Mendoza-Arnau
A, Vallecillo-Capilla MF, Cabrerizo-Vlchez M, Rosales-Leal JI. Topographic
characterisation of dental implants for commercial use. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Sep 1;21
(5):e631-6.
doi:10.4317/medoral.20333
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20333
1.
Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA. Implant materials, designs and surface
topographies: Their effect on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants. 2000;15:675-90. |
|
|
|
2.
Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmn A. Improved retention and
bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:659-66. |
|
|
|
3.
Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J. The jumping distance revisited:
An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:35-42. |
|
|
|
4.
Keller JC, Schneider GB, Stanford CM. Effects on implant microtopography on
osteoblast cell attachment. Implant Dent. 2003;12:175-81. |
|
|
|
5.
Szmukler-Moncler S, Testori T, Bernard JP. Etched implants: A comparative
surface analysis of four implant systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.
2004;69B:46-57. |
|
|
|
6.
Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in
the maxila of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants. 1998;13:611-9. |
|
|
|
7.
Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S. Influence of surface characteristics on
bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature
pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889-902. |
|
|
|
8.
Montero J, Bravo M, Guadilla Y, Portillo M, Blanco L, Rojo R, et al.
Comparison of Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Zirconia Versus Titanium
Implants Placed in Fresh Sockets: A 5-Month Study in Beagles. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Feb 11. [Epub ahead of print] |
|
|
|
9.
Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on
the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater
Res. 1995;29:1567-75. |
|
|
|
10.
Wennerberg A, Albrektson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone
integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009;20:172-84. |
|
|
|
11.
Herbst D, Dullabh H, Sykes L, Vorster C. Evaluation of surface
characteristics of titanium and cobalt chromium implant abutment materials.
SADJ. 2013;68:350-6. |
|
|
|
12.
Ferraris S, Spriano S, Pan G, Venturello A, Bianchi CL, Chiesa R, et al.
Surface modification of Ti-6Al-4V alloy for biomineralization and specific
biological response: Part I, inorganic modification. J Mater Sci Mater Med.
2011;22:533-45. |
|
|
|
13.
Inzunza D, Covarrubias C, Von Marttens A, Leighton Y, Carvajal JC, Valenzuela
F, et al. Synthesis of nanostructured porous silica coatings on titanium and
their cell adhesive and osteogenic differentiation properties. J Biomed Mater
Res A. 2014;102:37-48. |
|
|
|
14.
An N, Rausch-fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Andrukhov O, Schedle A. Initial
attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/viability and gene expression of
epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to
different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2012;28:1207-14. |
|
|
|
15.
Abron A, Hopfensperger M, Thompson J, Cooper LF. Evaluation of a predictive
model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the
rat tibia model. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:40. |
|
|
|
16.
Dunne CF, Twomey B, O'Neill L, Stanton KT. Co-blasting of titanium surfaces
with an abrasive and hydroxyapatite to produce bioactive coatings: Substrate
and coating characterisation. J Biom ater Appl. 2014;28:767-78. |
|
|
|
17.
Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline
deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surfaces. J
Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;90:577-85. |
|
|
|
18.
Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Vazquez L, Park YJ, Sammartino G, Bernard JP.
Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological
characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces. J Oral Implantol.
2011;37:525-42. |
|
|
|
19.
Rosa MB, Albrektsson T, Francischone CE, Filho HO, Wennerberg A. Micrometric
characterization of the implant surfaces from the five largest companies in
Brazil, the second largest worldwide implant market. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants. 2013;28:358-65. |
|
|
|
20.
Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, Haugen HJ. Titanium
implant surface modification by cathodic reduction in hydrofluoric acid:
surface characterization and in vivo performance. J Biomed Mater Res A.
2009;88:581-8. |
|
|
|
21.
Cao N, Dong J, Wang Q, Ma Q, Wang F, Chen H, et al. Plasma-sprayed
hydroxyapatite coating on carbon/carbon composite scaffolds for bone tissue
engineering and related tests in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92:1019-27. |
|
|
|
22.
Zinelis S, Thomas A, Syres K, Silikas N, Eliades G. Surface characterization
of zirconiza dental implants. Dental materials. 2010;26:295-305. |
|
|
|
23.
An N, Rausch-fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Andrukhov O, Schedle A. Initial
attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/viability and gene expression of
epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to
different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2012;28:1207-14. |
|
|
|
24.
Blanco J, Alvarez E, Mu-oz F, Li-ares A, Cantalapiedra A. Influence on early
osseointegration of dental implants installed with two different drilling
protocols: a histomorphometric study in rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2011;22:92-9. |
|
|
|
25.
Eisenbarth E, Velten D, Breme J. Effect of surface roughness on cell
adhesion. Biomol Eng. 2007;24:27-32. |
|
|
|
26.
Pebe P, Barbot R, Trinidad J, Pesquera A, Lucente J, Nishimura R, et al.
Counter torque testing and histomorphometric analysis of various implant
surfaces in canines: a pilot study. Implant Dentistry. 1997;6:259-65. |
|
|
|
27.
Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to
unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched
surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res.
1998;40:1-11. |
|
|
|
28.
Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA. Bone healing capacity of
titaniumplasma-sprayed and hydroxylapatite-coated oralimplants. Clinical Oral
Implants Research.1998; 9:261-71. |
|
|