Sala-Prez S, Lpez-Ramrez M, Quinteros-Borgarello M, Valmaseda-Castelln E, Gay-Escoda C. Antibacterial suture vs silk for the surgical removal of impacted lower
third molars. A randomized clinical study. Med Oral
Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jan
1;21 (1):e95-102.
doi:10.4317/medoral.20721
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20721
1.
Osborn TP, Frederickson G Jr, Small IA, Torgerson TS. A prospective study of
complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 1985;43:767-9. |
|
|
|
2.
Forbes SS, Stephen WJ, Harper WL, Loeb M, Smith R, Christoffersen EP, et al.
Implementation of evidence-based practices for surgical site infection
prophylaxis: results of a pre and postintervention study. J Am Coll Surg.
2008;207:336-41. |
|
|
|
3.
Leaper D, McBain AJ, Kramer A, Assadian O, Sanchez JL, Lumio J, et al.
Healthcare associated infection: novel strategies and antimicrobial implants
to prevent surgical site infection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:453-8. |
|
|
|
4.
Elek SD, Conen PE. The virulence of Staphylococcus pyogenes for man; a study
of the problems of wound infection. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957;38:573-86. |
|
|
|
5.
Dave RN, Joshi HM, Venugopalan VP. Novel biocatalytic polymer-based
antimicrobial coatings as potential ureteral biomaterial: preparation and in
vitro performance evaluation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:845-53. |
|
|
|
6.
Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Yazdani SK, Ladich E, et al. The
pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and
drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1314-22. |
|
|
|
7.
Parra F, Vzquez B, Benito L, Barcenilla J, San Roman J. Foldable
antibacterial acrylic intraocular lenses of high refractive index.
Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:3055-61. |
|
|
|
8.
Ming X, Nichols M, Rothenburger S. In vivo antibacterial efficacy of Monocryl
plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan). Surg Infect.
2007;8:209-14. |
|
|
|
9.
Ming X, Rothenburger S, Nichols MM. In vivo and in vitro antibacterial
efficacy of PDS plus (polidioxanone with triclosan) suture. Surg Infect.
2008;9:451-7. |
|
|
|
10.
Storch ML, Rothenburger SJ, Jacinto G. Experimental efficacy study of coated
Vicryl plus antibacterial suture in guinea pigs challenged with
Staphylococcus aureus. Surg Infect. 2004;5:281-8. |
|
|
|
11.
Gmez-Alonso A, Garca-Criado FJ, Parre-o-Manchado FC, Garca-Snchez JE,
Garca-Snchez E, Parre-o-Manchado A, et al. Study of the efficacy of Coated
VICRYL Plus Antibacterial suture (coated Polyglactin 910 suture with
Triclosan) in two animal models of general surgery. J Infect. 2007;54:82-8. |
|
|
|
12.
Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP, Krepel CJ, Johnson CP, Lewis BD, et al.
Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures
reduce the risk of microbial contamination?. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:481-9. |
|
|
|
13.
Storch M, Perry LC, Davidson JM, Ward JJ. A 28-day study of the effect of
Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with
triclosan) on wound healing in guinea pig linear incisional skin wounds. Surg
Infect (Larchmt). 2002;3 Suppl 1:S89-98. |
|
|
|
14.
Rozzelle CJ, Leonardo J, Li V. Antimicrobial suture wound closure for
cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized
controlled trial. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2:111-7. |
|
|
|
15.
Ford HR, Jones P, Gaines B, Reblock K, Simpkins DL. Intraoperative handling
and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus
antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with
coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Surg Infect.
2005;6:313-21. |
|
|
|
16.
Emori TG, Gaynes RP. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role
of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993;6:428-42. |
|
|
|
17.
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from
October 1986-April 1996, issued May 1996. A report from the National
Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Am J Infect Control.
1996;24:380-8. |
|
|
|
18.
Venema S, Abbas F, van de Belt-Gritter B, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, van
Hoogmoed CG. In vitro oral biofilm formation on triclosan-coated sutures in
the absence and presence of additional antiplaque treatment. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:980-5. |
|
|
|
19.
Marco F, Vllez R, Gonzlez P, Ortega L, de la Lama J, Lopez-Duran L. Study
of the efficacy of coated Vicryl plus antibacterial suture in an animal model
of orthopedic surgery. Surg Infect. 2007;8:359-65. |
|
|
|
20.
Pons-Vicente O, Lpez-Jimnez L, Sanchez-Garces MA, Sala-Prez S, Gay-Escoda
C. A comparative study between two different suture materials in oral
implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:282-8. |
|
|
|
21.
Ming X, Rothenburger S, Yang D. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of Monocryl
plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan). Surg Infect.
2007;8:201-8. |
|
|
|
22.
Storoe W, Haug RH, Lillich TT. The changing face of odontogenic infections. J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:739-48. |
|
|
|
23.
Rega AJ, Aziz SR, Ziccardi VB. Microbiology and antibiotic sensitivities of
head and neck space infections of odontogenic origin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2006;64:1377-80. |
|
|
|
24.
Fleck T, Moidl R, Blacky A, Fleck M, Wolner E, Grabenwoger M, et al.
Triclosan-coated sutures for the reduction of sternal wound infections:
economic considerations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:232-6. |
|
|
|
25.
Mingmalairak C, Ungbhakorn P, Paocharoen V. Efficacy of antimicrobial coating
suture coated polyglactin 910 with tricosan (Vicryl plus) compared with
polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in reduced surgical site infection of appendicitis,
double blind randomized control trial, preliminary safety report. J Med Assoc
Thai. 2009;92:770-5. |
|
|
|
26.
Deliaert AE, Van den Kerckhove E, Tuinder S, Fieuws S, Sawor JH,
Meesters-Caberg MA, et al. The effect of triclosan-coated sutures in wound
healing. A double blind randomised prospective pilot study. J Plast Reconstr
Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:771-3. |
|
|
|
27.
Chen SY, Chen TM, Dai NT, Fu JP, Chang SC, Deng SC, et al. Do
antibacterial-coated sutures reduce wound infection in head and neck cancer
reconstruction?. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:300-4. |
|
|
|
28.
Yilmaz N, Inal S, Muğlali M, Gven T, Baş B. Effects of
polyglecaprone 25, silk and catgut suture materials on oral mucosa wound
healing in diabetic rats: an evaluation of nitric oxide dynamics. Med Oral
Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:e526-30. |
|
|
|
29.
Huang T, Cheng P, Chan Y, Wang C, Fang K, Young T. Clinical and biomechanical
analyses to select a suture material for uvulopalatopharyngeal surgery.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143:655-61. |