Pellicer-Chover H, Pe–arrocha-Diago MA, Pe–arrocha-Oltra D, Gomar-Vercher S, Agust’n-Panadero R, Pe–arrocha-Diago M. Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: A prospective comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jan 1;21 (1):e103-10.  

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.20747

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20747

 

 

1. Calvo-Guirado JL, Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, Negri B, L—pez-Mar’ L, Rodriguez-Barba C, Schlottig F. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:308-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01841.x

 

2. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, HŸrzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:577-81.

 

3. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1303-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02111.x

 

4. Donovan R, Fetner A, Koutouzis T, Lundgren T. Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: a 1-year radiographic evaluation. J Periodontol. 2010;81:428-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090317

 

5. Wennerberg A, Sennerby L, Kultje C, Lekholm U. Some soft tissue characteristics at implant abutments with different surface topography. A study in humans. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30:88-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.10026.x

 

6. Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Faggion CM, Duncan WJ. The frequency of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2013;84:1586-98.

 

7. BrŒnemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstršm J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3:81-100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699

 

8. Heijdenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van der Reijden WA. Feasibility and influence of the microgap of two implants placed in a non-submerged procedure: a five-year follow-up clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1051-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050342

 

9. HŠmmerle CH, BrŠgger U, BŸrgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:111-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070204.x

 

10. Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Placement of two-part implants in sites with different buccal and lingual bone heights. J Periodontol. 2009;80:324-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080375

 

11. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina RU, Oates TW, Schenk RK, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res. 2003;82:232-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200316

 

12. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2000;71:1412-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1412

 

13. Pontes AE, Ribeiro FS, da Silva VC, Margonar R, Piattelli A, Cirelli JA, et al. Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model. J Periodontol. 2008;79:486-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070145

 

14. Stein AE, McGlmphy EA, Johnston WM, Larsen PE. Effects of implant design and surface roughness on crestal bone and soft tissue levels in the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:910-9.

 

15. do Nascimento C, Miani PK, Pedrazzi V, Muller K, de Albuquerque RF. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface: culture and DNA Checkerboard hybridization analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1168-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02280.x

 

16. Piattelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol. 2003;74:346-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.346

 

17. Schmitt CM, Nogueira-Filho G, Tenenbaum HC, Lai JY, Brito C, Dšring H, et al. Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:552-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34709

 

18. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990;1:33-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x

 

19. Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bell M, de Melo LG, Bosco AF. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:540-7.

 

20. Barros RR, Novaes AB, Muglia VA, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on peri-implant bone remodeling of adjacent and immediately loaded Morse cone connection implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:371-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01860.x

 

21. Huang B, Meng H, Piao M, Xu L, Zhang L, Zhu W. Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implant: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. J Periodontol. 2012;83:1164-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110617

 

22. Calvo-Guirado JL, Boquete-Castro A, Negri B, Delgado Ruiz R, G—mez-Moreno G, Iezzi G. Crestal bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. A pilot study in Foxhound dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:344-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12110

 

23. Koutouzis T, Fetner M, Fetner A, Lundgren T. Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement. J Periodontol. 2011;82:234-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100340

 

24. Romanos GE, Aydin E, Gaertner K, Nentwig GH. Long-term results after subcrestal or crestal placement of delayed loaded implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:133-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12084

 

25. Koh RU, Oh TJ, Rudek I, Neiva GF, Misch CE, Rothman ED, et al. Hard and soft tissue changes after crestal and subcrestal immediate implant placement. J Periodontol. 2011;82:1112-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.100541

 

26. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:11-25.

 

27. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1372-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1372

 

28. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina R, Schenk RK, Buser D, et al. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res. 2006;85:473-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500515

 

29. Larrucea Verdugo C, Jaramillo Nœ-ez G, Acevedo Avila A, Larrucea San Mart’n C. Microleakage of the prosthetic abutment/implant interface with internal and external connection: in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1078-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12217

 

30. Passos SP, Gressler May L, Faria R, …zcan M, Bottino MA. Implant-abutment gap versus microbial colonization: Clinical significance based on a literature review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101:1321-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32945