Sierra-S‡nchez JL, Garc’a-Sala-Bonmat’ F, Mart’nez-Gonz‡lez A, Garc’a-Dalmau C, Ma–es-Ferrer JF, Brotons-Oliver A. Predictability of short implants (< 10 mm) as a treatment option for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 May 1;21 (3):e392-402.  

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.20949

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20949

 

 

1. Araœjo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:545-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.x

 

2. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants-an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:86-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.023

 

3. Slotte C, Gr¿nningsaeter A. Four-Millimeter Implants Supporting Fixed Partial Dental Prostheses in the Severely Resorbed Posterior Mandible: Two-Year Results. Implant Dent. 2012;14 Suppl 1:46-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00346.x

 

4. Anitua E, Alkhraist MH, Pi-as L, Bego-a L, Orive G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:682-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3404

 

5. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S104-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x

 

6. Taschieri S, Corbella S, Del Fabbro M. Mini-invasive osteotome sinus floor elevation in partially edentulous atrophic maxilla using reduced length dental implants: interim results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:185-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00483.x

 

7. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20 Suppl 4:67-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01762.x

 

8. Bahat O. BrŒnemark System Implants in the Posterior Maxilla : Clinical Study of 660 Implants Followed for 5 to 12 Years. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants. 2000;15:646-53.

 

9. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chiapasco M, Lops D. Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:586-92.

 

10. Mendona JA, Francischone CE, Senna PM, Matos de Oliveira AE, Sotto-Maior BS. A retrospective evaluation of the survival rates of splinted and non-splinted short dental implants in posterior partially edentulous jaws. J Periodontol. 2014;85:787-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.130193

 

11. S‡nchez-GarcŽs M. Short implants: a descriptive study of 273 implants. Implant Dent. 2012;14:508-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00301.x

 

12. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F. Immediately loaded short implants: analysis of a case series of 133 implants. Quintessence Int. 2007;38:193-201.

 

13. Anitua E, Pi-as L, Bego-a L, Orive G. Long-term retrospective evaluation of short implants in the posterior areas: clinical results after 10-12 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:404-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12222

 

14. Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Marchetti C, Botticelli D. Early loading of 6-mm-short implants with a moderately rough surface supporting single crowns--a prospective 5-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:471-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12409

 

15. Anitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, And’a I. Five-year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study. J Periodontol. 2008;79:42-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070142

 

16. Pieri F, Aldini NN, Fini M, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Preliminary 2-year report on treatment outcomes for 6-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:279-89.

 

17. Mertens C, Meyer-BŠumer A, Kappel H, Hoffmann J, Steveling HG. Use of 8-mm and 9-mm implants in atrophic alveolar ridges: 10-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1501-8.

 

18. Birdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang SK. Crown-to-implant ratios of short-length implants. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36:425-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00071

 

19. Rokni S, Todescan R. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:69-76.

 

20. GuljŽ F, Abrahamsson I. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin oral Implant Res. 2013;24:1325-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12001

 

21. Monje A, Chan HL, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? A meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials. J Periodontol. 2013;84:895-904.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120328

 

22. Anitua E, Alkhraist MH, Pi-as L, Bego-a L, Orive G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:682-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3404

 

23. Lops D, Bressan E, Pisoni G, Cea N, Corazza B, Romeo E. Short implants in partially edentuolous maxillae and mandibles: a 10 to 20 years retrospective evaluation. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:351793.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/351793

 

24. Del Fabbro M, Wallace SS, Testori T. Long-term implant survival in the grafted maxillary sinus: a systematic review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:773-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.1288

 

25. Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7 Suppl 2:S219-34.

 

26. Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Mombelli A. The therapy of peri-implantitis: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:325-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.3

 

27. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:486-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01132.x

 

28. Anitua E, Tapia R, Luzuriaga F, Orive G. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30:89-95.

 

29. Srinivasan M, Vazquez L. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. Clin oral Implant Res. 2014;25:539-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12125

 

30. Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Garc’a-Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1119-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12236

 

31. Misch C, Steigenga J. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1340-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050402

 

32. [No authors listed]. Retraction. Rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla using short implants or sinus augmentation with simultaneous standard-length implant placement: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:924.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12029