Singh P, Ajmera DH, Xiao SS, Yang XZ, Liu X, Peng
B. Analysis of potential dynamic concealed factors in the
difficulty of lower third molar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Nov 1;21
(6):e713-23.
doi:10.4317/medoral.21211
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.21211
|
1. Arta SA, Pourabbas Kheyradin R, Mesgarzadeh AH, Hassanbaglu B. Comparison of the influence of two flap designs
on periodontal healing after surgical extraction of impacted third molars. Journal of dental research,
dental clinics, dental prospects.
2011;5:1-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Janson G, de Lima KJ, Woodside
DG, Metaxas A, de Freitas MR, Henriques
JF. Class II subdivision malocclusion types and evaluation of their asymmetries. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2007;131:57-66. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Richardson ME. The etiology
and prediction of mandibular third
molar impaction. The Angle orthodontist.
1977;47:165-72. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Komerik N, Muglali M, Tas B, Selcuk U. Difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar
tooth removal: predictive ability of senior surgeons and residents. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1062.e1-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:771-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Lago-Mndez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera
C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gndara Rey JM, Garca-Garca
A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:979-83. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. The British journal of oral
& maxillofacial surgery.
2002;40:26-31. |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Juodzbalys G, Daugela P.
Mandibular third molar impaction:
review of literature and
a proposal of a classification.
Journal of oral & maxillofacial
research. 2013;4:e1. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Franco FC, de Araujo TM, Vogel CJ, Quintao CC. Brachycephalic, dolichocephalic and mesocephalic:
Is it appropriate
to describe the face using skull
patterns? Dental press journal of orthodontics.
2013;18:159-63. |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and
prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34:812-40. |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Ingervall B, Helkimo E. Masticatory muscle force and facial morphology in man. Arch Oral Biol.
1978;23:203-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Satiroglu F, Arun T, Isik F. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography. European journal of orthodontics. 2005;27:562-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Benington PC, Gardener JE, Hunt NP. Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. European journal of orthodontics.
1999;21:659-70. |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Kiliaridis S. Masticatory muscle influence on craniofacial growth. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 1995;53:196-202. |
|
|
|
|
|
15. Mavropoulos A, Ammann P, Bresin A, Kiliaridis S. Masticatory demands induce region-specific changes in
mandibular bone density
in growing rats. The Angle orthodontist.
2005;75:625-30. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. Enomoto A, Watahiki J,
Yamaguchi T, Irie T, Tachikawa
T, Maki K. Effects of mastication on mandibular growth evaluated by microcomputed tomography. European journal of orthodontics.
2010;32:66-70. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Sato H, Kawamura A, Yamaguchi M, Kasai K. Relationship between masticatory function and internal structure of the mandible based on computed
tomography findings. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:766-73. |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Loh PL, Chew CL. Interocclusal distance in patients with different skeletal patterns. Singapore dental journal. 1995;20:4-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
19. Rubin CT. Skeletal strain and the functional significance of bone architecture. Calcified tissue international. 1984;36 Suppl
1:S11-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
20. Currey JD. Effects of differences in mineralization on the mechanical
properties of bone. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London
Series B. Biological sciences.
1984;304:509-18. |
|
|
|
|
|
21. Prasad M, Hussain MZ, Shetty SK, Kumar TA, Khaur M, George SA, et al. Median mandibular flexure at different mouth opening and its relation to different facial types: A prospective clinical study. Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine. 2013;4:426-30. |
|
|
|
|
|
22. Vukusic N, Lapter M, Muretic Z. Change in the inclination of the occlusal plane during craniofacial growth and development. Collegium antropologicum. 2000;24:145-50. |
|
|
|
|
|
23. Ogawa T, Koyano K, Umemoto G. Inclination of the occlusal plane and occlusal guidance as contributing factors in mastication. J Dent. 1998;26:641-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
24. Kumar KP, Tamizharasi S. Significance of curve of Spee: An orthodontic review. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2012;4(Suppl
2):S323-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Turner CH, Pavalko FM. Mechanotransduction
and functional response of the
skeleton to physical stress: the mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation. J Orthop Sci. 1998;3:346-55. |
|
|
|
|
|
26. Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. European journal of orthodontics.
2001;23:15-23. |
|
|
|
|
|
27. Tsunori M, Mashita M, Kasai K. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. The Angle orthodontist.
1998;68:557-62. |
|
|
|
|
|
28. Flanagan D. A comparison of
facial and lingual cortical thicknesses in edentulous maxillary and
mandibular sites measured
on computerized tomograms. The Journal of oral implantology.
2008;34:256-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
29. Renton T, Smeeton N, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of
mandibular third molar surgery.
British dental journal. 2001;190:607-10. |
|
|
|
|