Díaz-Sánchez RM, Delgado-Muñoz JM, Serrera-Figallo MA, González-Martín MI, Torres-Lagares D, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL. Analysis of marginal bone loss and implant stability quotient by resonance frequency analysis in different osteointegrated implant systems. Randomized prospective clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Mar 1;24 (2):e260-4. 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.22742

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.22742

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

References

1. Niu W, Wang P, Zhu S, Liu Z, Ji P. Marginal bone loss around dental implants with and without microthreads in the neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:34-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.003
PMid:27646798

 

2. Moraschini V, Velloso G, Luz D, Barboza EP. Implant survival rates, marginal bone level changes, and complications in full-mouth rehabilitation with flapless computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:892-901.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.02.013
PMid:25790741

 

3. Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A. Evaluation of Implant Collar Surfaces for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4987526.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4987526
PMid:27493957 PMCid:PMC4963580

 

4. Charyeva O, Altynbekov K, Zhartybaev R, Sabdanaliev A. Long-term dental implant success and survival − a clinical study after an observation period up to 6 years. Swed Dent J 2012;36:1-6.
PMid:22611899

 

5. van Velzen FJJ, Ofec R, Schulten EAJM, ten Bruggenkate CM. 10-year sur- vival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1121-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12499
PMid:25370914

 

6. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009;20:827–32.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01730.x
PMid:19508341

 

7. Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010;21:129–36.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x
PMid:19709058

 

8. Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2007;18:465–70
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01302.x
PMid:17441983

 

9. Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:789-94.
PMid:17066642

 

10. Hudieb MI, Wakabayashi N, Kasugai S. Magnitude and direction of me- chanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant. J Periodontol. 2011;82:1061-70.
https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100237
PMid:21189091

 

11. Sánchez-Siles M, Mu-oz-Cámara D, Salazar-Sánchez N, Ballester-Ferrandis JF, Camacho-Alonso F. Incidence of peri-implantitis and oral quality of life in patients rehabilitated with implants with different neck designs: A 10-year retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:2168-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.010
PMid:26589179

 

12. den Hartog L, Meijer HJA, Stegenga B, Tymstra N, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2011;22:1289–97.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02109.x
PMid:21985286

 

13. Van de Velde T, Collaert B, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Effect of implant design on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12:134-41.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00145.x
PMid:19220843

 

14. Kang YI, Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Effect of thread size on the implant neck area: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1147-51.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02298.x
PMid:22092875

 

15. Becker W, Becker BE, Hujoel P, Abu Ras Z, Goldstein M, Smidt A. Prospective clinical trial evaluating a new implant system for implant survival, implant stability and radiographic bone changes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15:15-21
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00333.x
PMid:21223489

 

16. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:51-66.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
PMid:18412573

 

17. Sim C, Lang N. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by OsstellTM mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Impl Res 2010;21:598-604.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01878.x
PMid:20666786

 

18. Diaz-Sanchez RM, Delgado-Mu-oz JM, Hita-Iglesias P, Pullen KT, Serrera-Figallo MA, Torres-Lagares D. Improvement in the initial ISQ through use of a modified surgical technique. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43:186-93.
https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00159
PMid:28218866

 

19. Waechter J, Madruga MM, Carmo Filho LC, Leite FRM, Schinestsck AR, Faot F. Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial focusing on implant stability changes during early healing. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:733-41.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12501
PMid:28557376