Díaz-Sánchez RM, Delgado-Muñoz JM, Serrera-Figallo MA, González-Martín MI, Torres-Lagares D, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL. Analysis of marginal bone loss and implant stability quotient by resonance frequency analysis in different osteointegrated implant systems. Randomized prospective clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Mar 1;24 (2):e260-4.
doi:10.4317/medoral.22742
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.22742
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
References
1.
Niu W, Wang P, Zhu S, Liu Z, Ji P. Marginal bone loss around dental implants
with and without microthreads in the neck: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:34-40. |
|
|
|
2.
Moraschini V, Velloso G, Luz D, Barboza EP. Implant survival rates, marginal
bone level changes, and complications in full-mouth rehabilitation with
flapless computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:892-901. |
|
|
|
3.
Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A. Evaluation of Implant Collar Surfaces for
Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int.
2016;2016:4987526. |
|
|
|
4.
Charyeva O, Altynbekov K, Zhartybaev R, Sabdanaliev A. Long-term dental
implant success and survival − a clinical study after an observation period
up to 6 years. Swed Dent J 2012;36:1-6. |
|
|
|
5.
van Velzen FJJ, Ofec R, Schulten EAJM, ten Bruggenkate CM. 10-year sur- vival
rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental
implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and
partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1121-8. |
|
|
|
6.
Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with
microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical
study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009;20:827–32. |
|
|
|
7.
Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. The effect of thread pattern upon
implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010;21:129–36. |
|
|
|
8.
Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of microthread on the
maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral
Impl Res. 2007;18:465–70 |
|
|
|
9.
Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal
bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:789-94. |
|
|
|
10.
Hudieb MI, Wakabayashi N, Kasugai S. Magnitude and direction of me- chanical
stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant. J
Periodontol. 2011;82:1061-70. |
|
|
|
11.
Sánchez-Siles M, Mu-oz-Cámara D, Salazar-Sánchez N, Ballester-Ferrandis JF,
Camacho-Alonso F. Incidence of peri-implantitis and oral quality of life in
patients rehabilitated with implants with different neck designs: A 10-year
retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:2168-74. |
|
|
|
12.
den Hartog L, Meijer HJA, Stegenga B, Tymstra N, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM.
Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a
randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2011;22:1289–97. |
|
|
|
13.
Van de Velde T, Collaert B, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Effect of implant design
on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.
2010;12:134-41. |
|
|
|
14.
Kang YI, Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Effect of thread size on the implant neck
area: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2012;23:1147-51. |
|
|
|
15.
Becker W, Becker BE, Hujoel P, Abu Ras Z, Goldstein M, Smidt A. Prospective
clinical trial evaluating a new implant system for implant survival, implant
stability and radiographic bone changes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.
2013;15:15-21 |
|
|
|
16.
Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance
frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications.
Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:51-66. |
|
|
|
17.
Sim C, Lang N. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by
OsstellTM mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument
positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Impl Res
2010;21:598-604. |
|
|
|
18.
Diaz-Sanchez RM, Delgado-Mu-oz JM, Hita-Iglesias P, Pullen KT,
Serrera-Figallo MA, Torres-Lagares D. Improvement in the initial ISQ through
use of a modified surgical technique. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43:186-93. |
|
|
|
19.
Waechter J, Madruga MM, Carmo Filho LC, Leite FRM, Schinestsck AR, Faot F.
Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions
of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial
focusing on implant stability changes during early healing. Clin Implant Dent
Relat Res. 2017;19:733-41. |