Dias MJM, Franco A, Junqueira JLC, Fayad FT, Pereira PH, Oenning AC. Marginal bone loss in the second molar related to impacted mandibular third molars: comparison between panoramic images and cone beam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 May 1;25 (3):e395-402.


doi:10.4317/medoral.23443

https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.23443


1. Tolentino PHMP, Rodrigues LG, Miranda de Torres É, Franco A, Silva RF. Extractions in patients with periodontal diseases and clinical decision-making process. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53:141-9.

https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/2/6

PMid:31341322 PMCid:PMC6604564

2. Paulander J, Wennström JL, Axelsson P, Lindhe J. Some risk factors for periodontal bone loss in 50-year-old individuals. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:489-96.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00514.x

PMid:15191581 

3. Hermann L, Wenzel A, Schropp L, Matzen L. Marginal bone loss and resorption of second molars related to maxillary third molars in panoramic images compared with CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20180313.

https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180313

PMid:30652501 

4. Reyes-Gilabert E, Luque-Romero LG, Bejarano-Avila G, Garcia-Palma A, Rollon-Mayordomo A, Infante-Cossio P. Assessment of pre and postoperative anxiety in patients undergoing ambulatory oral surgery in primary care. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22:e716-22.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21929

PMid:29053655 PMCid:PMC5813990

5. Carter K, Worthington S. Predictors of third molar impaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;95:267-76.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515615857

PMid:26561441 

6. Garaas R, Moss KL, Fisher EL, Wilson G, Offenbacher S, Beck JD, et al. Prevalence of visible third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in middle-aged and older Americans. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:463-70.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.021

PMid:21168252 

7. Nunn ME, Fish MD, Garcia RI, Kaye EK, Figueroa R, Gohel A, et al. Retained asymptomatic third molars and risk for second molar pathology. J Dent Res. 2013;92: 1095-9.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513509281

PMid:24132082 PMCid:PMC3834658

8. Schmidt JC, Gutekunst CJ, Dagassan-Berndt D, Schmidlin PR, Walter C. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiographs using clinically relevant parameters. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7:50.

https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7020050

PMid:31052379 PMCid:PMC6630924

9. Matzen LH, Schropp L, Spin-Neto R1, Wenzel A. Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:20160330.

https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160330

PMid:27681861 PMCid:PMC5595057

10. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1495-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013

PMid:25046131 

11. Miclotte A, Grommen B, Llano-Pérula MC, Verdonck A, Jacobs R, Willems G. The effect of first and second premolar extractions on third molars: A retrospective longitudinal study. J Dent. 2017;61:55-66.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.03.007

PMid:28359700 

12. Hermann L, Wenzel A, Schropp L, Matzen LH. Impact of CBCT on treatment decision related to surgical removal of impacted maxillary third molars: does CBCT change the surgical approach? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20190209.

https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190209

PMid:31452392 

13. Hermann L, Wenzel A, Schropp L, Matzen LH. Marginal bone loss and resorption of second molars related to maxillary third molars in panoramic images compared with CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018;48:20180313.

https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180313

PMid:30652501 

14. Oenning ACC, Neves FS, Alencar PNB, Prado RF, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1444-55.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.023

PMid:24856956 

15. Miclotte A, Franco A, Guerrero ME, Willems G, Jacbos R. The association between orthodontic treatment and third molar position, inferior alveolar nerve involvement, and prediction of wisdom tooth eruption. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:333-9.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1357-8

PMid:25107322 

16. Brasil DM, Nascimento EHL, Gaêta-Araujo H, Oliveira-Santos C, Almeida SM. Is panoramic imaging equivalent to cone-beam computed tomography for classifying impacted lower third molars?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:1968-74.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.041

PMid:31075253 

17. Matzen LH, Schropp L, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Use of cone beam computed tomography to assess significant imaging findings related to mandibular third molar impaction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;124:506-16.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.07.007

PMid:28867462 

18. Oenning ACC, Melo SLS, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. Mesial inclination of impacted third molars and its propensity to stimulate external root resorption in second molars - a cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:379-86.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.008

PMid:25577457 

19. Vranckx M, Ockerman A, Coucke W, Claerhout E, Grommen B, Miclotte A, et al. Radiographic prediction of mandibular third molar eruption and mandibular canal involvement based on angulation. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22:118-23.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12297

PMid:30734999 

20. De-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Oenning AC, Felizardo MG, Haiter-Neto F, de Freitas DQ. Accuracy of the vertical tube shift method in identifying the relationship between the third molars and the mandibular canal. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:583-8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1277-3

PMid:24994577