Yu J, Liu S, Zhang X. Can buccal infiltration of articaine replace traditional inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of mandibular molars in pediatric patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Nov 1;26 (6):e754-61.



doi:10.4317/medoral.24726

https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.24726


1. Jorgenson K, Burbridge L, Cole B. Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21:171-7.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00496-8

PMid:31832992 

2. McLure HA, Rubin AP. Review of local anaesthetic agents. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71:59-74.

PMid:15714182

3. Hopman AJG, Baart JA, Brand HS. Articaine and neurotoxicity-A review. Br Dent J. 2017;223:501-6.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.782

PMid:28972589 

4. Snoeck M. Articaine: A review of its use for localand regional anesthesia. Local Reg Anesth. 2013;5:23-33.

https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S16682

PMid:22915899 PMCid:PMC3417979

5. Majid OW, Muhammad ZA. Effectiveness of Articaine Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia for Mandibular Premolar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:1784-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.033

PMid:31028737 

6. Zhang A, Tang H, Liu S, Ma C, Ma S, Zhao H. Anesthetic Efficiency of Articaine Versus Lidocaine in the Extraction of Lower Third Molars: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:18-28.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.020

PMid:30267700 

7. Tong HJ, Alzahrani FS, Sim YF, Tahmassebi JF, Duggal M. Anaesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in children's dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28:347-60.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12363

PMid:29635712 

8. Taneja S, Singh A, Jain A. Anesthetic Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine in Pediatric Patients During Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatr Dent. 2020;42:273-81.

PMid:32847666

9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

PMid:19621072 PMCid:PMC2707599

10. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

PMid:22008217 PMCid:PMC3196245

11. Arrow P. A comparison of articaine 4% and lignocaine 2% in block and infiltration analgesia in children. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:325-33.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01699.x

PMid:22924356 

12. Arali V, Mytri P. Anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine mandibular buccal infiltration compared to 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in children with irreversible pulpitis. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2015;9:ZC65-7.

https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12821.5856

PMid:26023647 PMCid:PMC4437163

13. Chopra R, Marwaha M, Bansal K, Mittal M. Evaluation of buccal infiltration with articaine and inferior alveolar nerve block with lignocaine for pulp therapy in mandibular primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40:301-5.

https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.301

PMid:27471808 

14. Alinejhad D, Bahrololoomi Z, Navabazam A, Asayesh MA. Comparison of visual analog scale scores in pain assessment during pulpotomy using different injection materials in children aged 6 to 8 and 8 to 10 Years. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:313-7.

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2259

PMid:29603705 

15. Alzahrani F, Duggal MS, Munyombwe T, Tahmassebi JF. Anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for extraction and pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars: an equivalence parallel prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28:335-44.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12361

PMid:29573375 

16. Ghadimi S, Shahrabi M, Khosravi Z, Behroozi R. The efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12:97-101.

https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.015

PMid:30087759 PMCid:PMC6076876

17. Jorgenson K, Burbridge L, Cole B. Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21:171-7.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00496-8

PMid:31832992 

18. MM A, Khatri A, Kalra N, Tyagi R, Khandelwal D. Pain perception and efficacy of local analgesia using 2% lignocaine, buffered lignocaine, and 4% articaine in pediatric dental procedures. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019;19:101.

https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.2.101

PMid:31065592 PMCid:PMC6502762

19. Tortamano IP, Siviero M, Lee S, Sampaio RM, Simone JL, Rocha RG. Onset and duration period of pulpal anesthesia of articaine and lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block. Braz Dent J. 2013;24:371-4.

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302072

PMid:24173259 

20. Haase A, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Drum M. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1228-35.

https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0338

PMid:18762633 

21. Rayati F, Noruziha A, Jabbarian R. Efficacy of buccal infiltration anaesthesia with articaine for extraction of mandibular molars: a clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:607-10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.06.012

PMid:29980352 

22. Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. Articaine Infiltration for Anesthesia of Mandibular First Molars. J Endod. 2008;34:514-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.042

PMid:18436027 

23. Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:278-283.

PMid:1815200

24. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between Articaine HCl and Lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:307-11.

PMid:10969438

25. Massignan C, Silveira Santos P, Cardoso M, Bolan M. Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47:1031-40.

https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12989

PMid:32383196 

26. Maruthingal S, Mohan D, Maroli R, Alahmari A, Alqahtani A, Alsadoon M. A comparative evaluation of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A clinical study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5:463.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.167717

PMid:26759799 PMCid:PMC4697230

27. Mittal M, Sharma S, Kumar A, Chopra R, Srivastava D. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:520-4.

PMid:26883609

28. Rathi NV, Khatri AA, Agrawal AG, Sudhindra Baliga M, Thosar NR, Deolia SG. Anesthetic efficacy of buccal infiltration articaine versus lidocaine for extraction of primary molar teeth. Anesth Prog. 2019;66:3-7.

https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-65-04-02

PMid:30883236 PMCid:PMC6424172

29. Nakai Y, Milgrom P, Mancl L, Coldwell SE, Domoto PK, Ramsay DS. Effectiveness of local anesthesia in pediatric dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:1699-705.

https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0115

PMid:11143733 

30. Malka A, Maya G. Pain-related Disruptive Behavior during Dental Treatment Interpreted as Uncooperative Behavior-Small Case Series. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12:347-51.

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1618

PMid:31866722 PMCid:PMC6898878

31. Lee CR, Yang HJ. Alternative techniques for failure of conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019;19:125.

https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.3.125

PMid:31338418 PMCid:PMC6620537

32. Ogle OE, Mahjoubi G. Local Anesthesia: Agents, Techniques, and Complications. Dent Clin North Am. 2012;56:133-48.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.08.003

PMid:22117947 

33. Robertson D, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, McCartney M. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:1104-12.

https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0324

PMid:17670879 

34. Nydegger B, Nusstein J, Reader A, Drum M, Beck M. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: A prospective randomized, double-blind study. J Endod. 2014;40:1912-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.001

PMid:25218523 

35. Zain M, Khattak SUR, Sikandar H, Shah SA, Fayyaz. Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine primary buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in symptomatic mandibular first molar teeth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2016;26:4-8.

PMid:26787022

36. Bataineh AB, Alwarafi MA. Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2241-50.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1712-8

PMid:26791025