1. Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C, et al. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:6285620.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6285620

PMid:27478833 PMCid:PMC4958483

2. Ramanauskaite A, Juodzbalys G. Diagnostic Principles of Peri-Implantitis: a Systematic Review and Guidelines for Peri-Implantitis Diagnosis Proposal. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016;7:1-15.

https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2016.7308

PMid:27833733 PMCid:PMC5100648

3. Mellado-Valero A, Buitrago-Vera P, Solá-Ruiz MF, Ferrer-García JC. Decontamination of dental implant surface in peri-implantitis treatment: a literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e869-76.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19420

PMid:23986023 PMCid:PMC3854079

4. Sewerin IP, Gotfredsen K, Stoltze K. Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of peri-implant radiolucencies--an in vitro experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:299-304.

https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080408.x

PMid:9586477 

5. Dave M, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer R. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:671-8.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02473.x

PMid:22458628 

6. Sirin Y, Horasan S, Yaman D, Basegmez C, Tanyel C, Aral A, Guven K. Detection of Crestal Radiolucencies around Dental Implants: An in Vitro Experimental Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:1540-50.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.02.024

PMid:22698290 

7. Kaeppler G, Dietz K, Reinert S. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:271-7.

https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/16653683

PMid:16798925 

8. Dula K, Sanderink G, van der Stelt PF, Mini R, Buser D. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;86:227-33.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90130-5

PMid:9720100

9. Dannewitz B, Hassfeld S, Eickholz P, Mühling J. Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:50-5.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600651

PMid:11803389 

10. Alkurt MT, Peker İ, Usalan G, Altunkaynak B. Clinical Evaluation of Dose Reduction on Image Quality of Panoramic Radiographs. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9:34-41.

https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-9-5-34

PMid:18633467 

11. Pinheiro LR, Scarfe WC, de Oliveira Sales MA, Gaia BF, Cortes AR, Cavalcanti MG. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:741-50.

https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5311

PMid:28708906 

12. Misch CE. Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol. 1990;7:9-17.

PMid:2103123

13. Andrés-García R, Vives NG, Climent FH, Palacín AF, Santos VR, Climent MH, et al. In vitro evaluation of the influence of the cortical bone on the primary stability of two implant systems. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:E93-97

PMid:19179957

14. Ramesh A, Ludlow JB, Webber RL, Tyndall DA, Paquette D. Evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography in the detection of simulated periodontal defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:341-9.

https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.120057

PMid:11925546 

15. Schropp L, Alyass NS, Wenzel A, Stavropoulos A. Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:686-90.

https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/33467269

PMid:22933536 PMCid:PMC3528195

16. Léda L, Azevedo TD, Pimentel PA, de Toledo OA, Bezerra AC. Dentin Optical Density in Molars Subjected to Partial Carious Dentin Removal. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39:452-7.

https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.452

PMid:26551369 

17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74

https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

PMid:843571

18. Kullman L, Al-Asfour A, Zetterqvist L, Andersson L. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:96-100.

PMid:17340902

19. Mengel R, Kruse B, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital Volume Tomography in the Diagnosis of Peri-Implant Defects: An In Vitro Study on Native Pig Mandibles. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1234-41.

https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050424

PMid:16805688 

20. Kühl S, Zürcher S, Zitzmann NU, Filippi A, Payer M, Dagassan-Berndt D. Detection of peri-implant bone defects with different radiographic techniques - a human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:529-34.

https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12619

PMid:26059443 

21. Sakakura CE, Morais J, Loffredo L, Scaf G. A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32:397-400.

https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/20681066

PMid:15070843 

22. Choi B, Huh J, Suh C, Kim K. An in vitro evaluation of miniplate fixation techniques for fractures of the atrophic edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:174-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.024

PMid:15695047 

23. Neto JDP, Melo G, Marin C, Rivero ERC, Cruz ACC, Flores-Mir C, et al. Diagnostic performance of periapical and panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography for detection of circumferential gaps simulating osseointegration failure around dental implants : A systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;132:e208-22.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2021.08.012

PMid:34580020 

24. Gürdal P, Hildebolt CF, Akdeniz BG. The effects of different image file formats and image-analysis software programs on dental radiometric digital evaluations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30:50-5.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600570

PMid:11175274 

25. Berry HM. Cervical burnout and Mach band: two shadows of doubt in radiologic interpretation of carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;106:622-5.

https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0109

PMid:6575081 

26. Skodje F, Espelid I, Kvile K, Tveit AB. The influence of radiographic exposure factors on the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998;27:75-9.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600322

PMid:9656870 

27. van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Influence of inflammatory reactions vs. occlusal loading on peri-implant marginal bone level. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:130-5.

https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130010201

PMid:11276735 

28. Lane EJ, Proto AV, Phillips TW. Mach bands and density perception. Radiology. 1976;121:9-17.

https://doi.org/10.1148/121.1.9

PMid:959562