1. Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007;19:117-28.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.013

PMid:18088870 

2. Yolcu Ü, Acar AH. Comparison of a new flap design with the routinely used triangular flap design in third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:1390-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.007

PMid:26254819 

3. Balamurugan R, Zachariah T. Comparison of primary and secondary closure with a buccal mucosal-advancement flap on postoperative course after mandibular impacted third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24:37-43.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00814-w

PMid:31729607 

4. Chen YW, Lee CT, Hum L, Chuang SK. Effect of flap design on periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46:363-72.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.005

PMid:27600798 

5. Rabi A, Haris PMM, Panickal DM, Ahamed S, Pulikkottil VJ, Haris KTM. Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Flap Designs and Postoperative Outcome in the Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18:807-11.

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2131

PMid:28874646 

6. Baqain ZH, Al-Shafii A, Hamdan AA, Sawair FA. Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: a split mouth randomized clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1020-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.011

PMid:22424708 

7. Ma S, Li X, Zhang A, Liu S, Zhao H, Zhao H. Efficacy of secondary closure technique after extraction of third molars: a meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57:977-84.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.08.028

PMid:31540844 

8. Dubois DD, Pizer ME, Chinnis RJ. Comparison of primary and secondary closure techniques after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1982;40:631-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(82)90111-2

PMid:6956684 

9. Pachipulusu PK, S M. Comparative study of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;22:261-6.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0696-8

PMid:29796741 

10. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:2-7.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0188-x

PMid:12673431 

11. Szmyd L. Impacted teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 1971;15:299-318.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01494-X

PMid:4926802 

12. Amin MM, Laskin DM. Prophylactic use of indomethacin for prevention of postsurgical complications after removal of impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55:448-51.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(83)90227-X

PMid:6575332 

13. Şimşek Kaya G, Yapıcı Yavuz G, Saruhan N. The influence of flap design on sequelae and quality of life following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A split-mouth randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:828-35.

https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12814

PMid:31050816 

14. Majid OW. Submucosal dexamethasone injection improves quality of life measures after third molar surgery: a comparative study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2289-97.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.037

PMid:21514710 

15. Ibikunle AA, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL. Oral health-related quality of life following third molar surgery with either oral administration or submucosal injection of prednisolone. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;20:343-52.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-016-0571-4

PMid:27447802 

16. Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, Gutwald R, Reichman J, Otero-Cepeda XL, Schmelzeisen R. Marginal flap versus paramarginal flap in impacted third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95:403-8.

https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.84

PMid:12686924 

17. Dolanmaz D, Esen A, Isik K, Candirli C. Effect of 2 flap designs on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116:e244-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.030

PMid:22819455 

18. Koyuncu BÖ, Cetingül E. Short-term clinical outcomes of two different flap techniques in impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116:e179-84.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.023

PMid:22921446 

19. Erdogan O, Tatlı U, Ustün Y, Damlar I. Influence of two different flap designs on the sequelae of mandibular third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;15:147-52.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-011-0268-7

PMid:21484217 

20. Acar AH, Kazancioğlu HO, Erdem NF, Asutay F. Is Horizontal Mattress Suturing More Effective Than Simple Interrupted Suturing on Postoperative Complications and Primary Wound Healing After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery?. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:e657-61.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003813

PMid:28857982 

21. Jakse N, Bankaoglu V, Wimmer G, Eskici A, Pertl C. Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: evaluation of 2 different flap designs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:7-12.

https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.119519

PMid:11805771 

22. Şimşek Kaya G, Yapıcı Yavuz G, Saruhan N. The influence of flap design on sequelae and quality of life following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A split-mouth randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:828-35.

https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12814

PMid:31050816 

23. Hu T, Zhang J, Ma JZ, Shao LN, Gu YF, Li DQ, et al. A novel method in the removal of impacted mandibular third molar: buccal drainage. Sci Rep. 2017;7:12602.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12722-8

PMid:28974709 PMCid:PMC5626681

24. Waite PD, Cherala S. Surgical outcomes for suture-less surgery in 366 impacted third molar patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:669-73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.014

PMid:16546647 

25. Osunde OD, Adebola RA, Saheeb BD. A comparative study of the effect of suture-less and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1275-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.009

PMid:22591717 

26. Sanchis Bielsa JM, Hernández-Bazán S, Peñarrocha Diago M. Flap repositioning versus conventional suturing in third molar surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:E138-42.

PMid:18223532

27. Alkadi S, Stassen L. Effect of One-Suture and Sutureless Techniques on Postoperative Healing After Third Molar Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:703.e1-16.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.001

PMid:30611694 

28. Osunde OD, Saheeb BD, Adebola RA. Comparative study of effect of single and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:971-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.009

PMid:20950914 

29. Shevel E, Koepp WG, Bütow KW. A subjective assessment of pain and swelling following the surgical removal of impacted third molar teeth using different surgical techniques. SADJ. 2001;56:238-41.

PMid:11490696

30. Nayak SS, Arora A, Shah A, Sanghavi A, Kamath AT, Nayak VS. The Influence of the Suture-less Anterior Releasing Incision in a Triangular Flap Design on Postoperative Healing Following Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020;10:262-8.

https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_444_19

PMid:32802771 PMCid:PMC7402254