Santmartí-Oliver M, Bazal-Bonelli S, Sánchez-Labrador L, Beca-Campoy T, Pérez-González F, Cobo-Vázquez CM, et al. Cyanoacrylate versus suture as flap closure methods in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Jul 1;29 (4):e458-67.
doi:10.4317/medoral.26375
https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.26375
1. Altaweel AA, El-Hamid Gaber A, Alnaffar MZ, Almowallad AS, Almech MH, Almuwallad AS, et al. A novel therapeutic approach for reducing postoperative inflammatory complications after impacted mandibular third molar removal. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101:e30436. |
PMid:36123843 PMCid:PMC9478325 |
2. Ma S, Li X, Zhang A, Liu S, Zhao H, Zhao H. Efficacy of secondary closure technique after extraction of third molars: a meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57:977-84. |
PMid:31540844 |
3. Asher R, Chacartchi T, Tandlich M, Shapira L, Polak D. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:559-65. |
PMid:29717362 |
4. Kumar MS, Natta S, Shankar G, Reddy SHK, Visalakshi D, Seshiah G V. Comparison between silk sutures and cyanoacrylate adhesive in human mucosa- a clinical and histological study. J Int Oral Heal. 2013;5:95-100. |
PMid:24324311 |
5. Suthar P, Shah S, Waknis P, Limaye G, Saha A, Sathe P. Comparing intra-oral wound healing after alveoloplasty using silk sutures and n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;46:28-35. |
PMid:32158678 PMCid:PMC7049767 |
6. Ghoreishian M, Gheisari R, Fayazi M. Tissue adhesive and suturing for closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e14-6. |
PMid:19464207 |
7. Joshi AD, Saluja H, Mahindra U, Halli R. A comparative study: efficacy of tissue glue and sutures after impacted mandibular third molar removal. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011;10:310-5. |
PMid:23204746 PMCid:PMC3267907 |
8. Oladega AA, James O, Adeyemo WL. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or silk suture for closure of surgical wound following removal of an impacted mandibular third molar: a randomized controlled study. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2019;47:93-8. |
PMid:30501926 |
9. Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:771-4. |
PMid:19304033 |
10. Garcia Garcia A, Gude Sampedro F, Gandara Rey J, Gallas Torreira M. Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:1223-6. |
PMid:9371111 |
11. Amin M, Laskin D. Prophylactic use of indomethacin for prevention of postsurgical complications after removal of impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55:448-51. |
PMid:6575332 |
12. Madrazo-Jiménez M, Rodríguez-Caballero Á, Serrera-Figallo MÁ, Garrido-Serrano R, Gutiérrez-Corrales A, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL, et al. The effects of a topical gel containing chitosan, 0,2% chlorhexidine, allantoin and despanthenol on the wound healing process subsequent to impacted lower third molar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21:e696-702. |
PMid:27475700 PMCid:PMC5116111 |
13. León S, Bravo-Cavicchioli D, Correa-Beltrán G, Giacaman RA. Validation of the Spanish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14Sp) in elderly Chileans. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:1-9. |
PMid:25091189 PMCid:PMC4128544 |
14. Papageorgiou SN. Patient drop-outs in clinical trials. J Orthod. 2019;46:378-80. |
PMid:31707950 |
15. Haraji A, Rakhshan V, Khamverdi N, Alishahi H. Effects of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on dry socket incidence and postsurgical pain: a double-blind split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orofac Pain. 2013;27:256-62. |
PMid:23882458 |
16. Rubio-Palau J, Garcia-Linares J, Hueto-Madrid JA, González-Lagunas J, Raspall-Martin GL, Mareque-Bueno J. Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20:e117-222. |
PMid:25475772 PMCid:PMC4320414 |
17. López-López J, Jané-Pallí E, González-Navarro B, Jané-Salas E, Estrugo-Devesa A, Milani M. Efficacy of chlorhexidine, dexpanthenol, allantoin and chitosan gel in comparison with bicarbonate oral rinse in controlling post-interventional inflammation, pain and cicatrization in subjects undergoing dental surgery. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31:2179-83. |
PMid:26471464 |
18. Gogulanathan M, Elavenil P, Gnanam A, Krishnakumar Raja VB. Evaluation of fibrin sealant as a wound closure agent in mandibular third molar surgery - a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:871-5. |
PMid:25721919 |
19. Pachipulusu PK, Manjula S. Comparative study of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;22:261-6. |
PMid:29796741 |
20. Ricard AS, Nau O, Veyret A, Majoufre-Lefèbvre C, Laurentjoye M. Comparaison entre fermeture et absence de fermeture du site d'avulsion des troisièmes molaires mandibulaires incluses: étude prospective randomisée. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2015;116:12-7. |
PMid:25577169 |
21. Chukwuma B, Taiwo A, Akinmoladun V, Ibikunle A, Bala M. Postoperative sequelae following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third-molar extraction using the complete closure versus the sutureless techniques. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022;12:12-9. |
PMid:36590767 PMCid:PMC9802601 |
22. Stran-Lo Giudice AF, Ortiz AM, Sánchez-Labrador L, Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann J, Cobo-Vázquez CM, Meniz-García C. Current status of split-mouth controlled clinical trials comparing cyanoacrylate vs. conventional suture after lower third molar surgeries: a systematic literature review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2023;81:349-57. |
PMid:36539386 |
23. Qiao F, Li L, Zhang J, Dong R, Sun J. Operation time is independent associated with serious postoperative symptom in patients with mandibular third molar removal. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:4080-9. |
PMid:33752425 |
24. Kulkarni S, Dodwad V, Chava V. Healing of periodontal flaps when closed with silk sutures and N-butyl cyanoacrylate: a clinical and histological study. Indian J Dent Res. 2007;18:72-7. |
PMid:17502712 |
25. Cobo-Vázquez C, Fernández-Tresguerres I, Ortega-Aranegui R, López-Quiles J. Effects of local melatonin application on post-extraction sockets after third molar surgery. A pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:e628-33. |
PMid:25350595 PMCid:PMC4259382 |
26. Sundaram K, Piuzzi NS, Patterson BM, Stearns KL, Krebs VE, Mont MA. Skin closure with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and polyester mesh after primary total knee arthroplasty offers superior cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared to staples: a prospective trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30:447-53. |
PMid:31691153 |
27. Koonce SL, Eck DL, Shaddix KK, Perdikis G. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl), octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond), and subcuticular suture for closure of surgical incisions. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:107-10. |
PMid:24905134 |
28. Aslam MI, Hunter DC. Does liquid tissue adhesive increase satisfaction with wound and stoma management after surgery?. J Wound Care. 2009;18:391-4. |
PMid:19789476 |
29. Borie E, Rosas E, Kuramochi G, Etcheberry S , Olate S, Weber B. Oral applications of cyanoacrylate adhesives: a literature review. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019:8217602. |
PMid:31008113 PMCid:PMC6441539 |