Santmartí-Oliver M, Bazal-Bonelli S, Sánchez-Labrador L, Beca-Campoy T, Pérez-González F, Cobo-Vázquez CM, et al. Cyanoacrylate versus suture as flap closure methods in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Jul 1;29 (4):e458-67.


doi:10.4317/medoral.26375

https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.26375


1. Altaweel AA, El-Hamid Gaber A, Alnaffar MZ, Almowallad AS, Almech MH, Almuwallad AS, et al. A novel therapeutic approach for reducing postoperative inflammatory complications after impacted mandibular third molar removal. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101:e30436.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030436

PMid:36123843 PMCid:PMC9478325

2. Ma S, Li X, Zhang A, Liu S, Zhao H, Zhao H. Efficacy of secondary closure technique after extraction of third molars: a meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57:977-84.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.08.028

PMid:31540844 

3. Asher R, Chacartchi T, Tandlich M, Shapira L, Polak D. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:559-65.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2476-0

PMid:29717362 

4. Kumar MS, Natta S, Shankar G, Reddy SHK, Visalakshi D, Seshiah G V. Comparison between silk sutures and cyanoacrylate adhesive in human mucosa- a clinical and histological study. J Int Oral Heal. 2013;5:95-100.

PMid:24324311

5. Suthar P, Shah S, Waknis P, Limaye G, Saha A, Sathe P. Comparing intra-oral wound healing after alveoloplasty using silk sutures and n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;46:28-35.

https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.1.28

PMid:32158678 PMCid:PMC7049767

6. Ghoreishian M, Gheisari R, Fayazi M. Tissue adhesive and suturing for closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e14-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.001

PMid:19464207 

7. Joshi AD, Saluja H, Mahindra U, Halli R. A comparative study: efficacy of tissue glue and sutures after impacted mandibular third molar removal. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011;10:310-5.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0241-x

PMid:23204746 PMCid:PMC3267907

8. Oladega AA, James O, Adeyemo WL. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or silk suture for closure of surgical wound following removal of an impacted mandibular third molar: a randomized controlled study. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2019;47:93-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.018

PMid:30501926 

9. Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:771-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010

PMid:19304033 

10. Garcia Garcia A, Gude Sampedro F, Gandara Rey J, Gallas Torreira M. Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:1223-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90172-5

PMid:9371111 

11. Amin M, Laskin D. Prophylactic use of indomethacin for prevention of postsurgical complications after removal of impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55:448-51.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(83)90227-X

PMid:6575332 

12. Madrazo-Jiménez M, Rodríguez-Caballero Á, Serrera-Figallo MÁ, Garrido-Serrano R, Gutiérrez-Corrales A, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL, et al. The effects of a topical gel containing chitosan, 0,2% chlorhexidine, allantoin and despanthenol on the wound healing process subsequent to impacted lower third molar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21:e696-702.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21281

PMid:27475700 PMCid:PMC5116111

13. León S, Bravo-Cavicchioli D, Correa-Beltrán G, Giacaman RA. Validation of the Spanish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14Sp) in elderly Chileans. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-95

PMid:25091189 PMCid:PMC4128544

14. Papageorgiou SN. Patient drop-outs in clinical trials. J Orthod. 2019;46:378-80.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312519883891

PMid:31707950 

15. Haraji A, Rakhshan V, Khamverdi N, Alishahi H. Effects of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on dry socket incidence and postsurgical pain: a double-blind split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orofac Pain. 2013;27:256-62.

https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1142

PMid:23882458 

16. Rubio-Palau J, Garcia-Linares J, Hueto-Madrid JA, González-Lagunas J, Raspall-Martin GL, Mareque-Bueno J. Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20:e117-222.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20009

PMid:25475772 PMCid:PMC4320414

17. López-López J, Jané-Pallí E, González-Navarro B, Jané-Salas E, Estrugo-Devesa A, Milani M. Efficacy of chlorhexidine, dexpanthenol, allantoin and chitosan gel in comparison with bicarbonate oral rinse in controlling post-interventional inflammation, pain and cicatrization in subjects undergoing dental surgery. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31:2179-83.

https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2015.1108909

PMid:26471464 

18. Gogulanathan M, Elavenil P, Gnanam A, Krishnakumar Raja VB. Evaluation of fibrin sealant as a wound closure agent in mandibular third molar surgery - a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:871-5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.02.001

PMid:25721919 

19. Pachipulusu PK, Manjula S. Comparative study of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;22:261-6.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0696-8

PMid:29796741 

20. Ricard AS, Nau O, Veyret A, Majoufre-Lefèbvre C, Laurentjoye M. Comparaison entre fermeture et absence de fermeture du site d'avulsion des troisièmes molaires mandibulaires incluses: étude prospective randomisée. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2015;116:12-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revsto.2014.11.009

PMid:25577169 

21. Chukwuma B, Taiwo A, Akinmoladun V, Ibikunle A, Bala M. Postoperative sequelae following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third-molar extraction using the complete closure versus the sutureless techniques. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022;12:12-9.

https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_191_22

PMid:36590767 PMCid:PMC9802601

22. Stran-Lo Giudice AF, Ortiz AM, Sánchez-Labrador L, Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann J, Cobo-Vázquez CM, Meniz-García C. Current status of split-mouth controlled clinical trials comparing cyanoacrylate vs. conventional suture after lower third molar surgeries: a systematic literature review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2023;81:349-57.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2022.2155238

PMid:36539386 

23. Qiao F, Li L, Zhang J, Dong R, Sun J. Operation time is independent associated with serious postoperative symptom in patients with mandibular third molar removal. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:4080-9.

https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-2340

PMid:33752425 

24. Kulkarni S, Dodwad V, Chava V. Healing of periodontal flaps when closed with silk sutures and N-butyl cyanoacrylate: a clinical and histological study. Indian J Dent Res. 2007;18:72-7.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.32424

PMid:17502712 

25. Cobo-Vázquez C, Fernández-Tresguerres I, Ortega-Aranegui R, López-Quiles J. Effects of local melatonin application on post-extraction sockets after third molar surgery. A pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:e628-33.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19851

PMid:25350595 PMCid:PMC4259382

26. Sundaram K, Piuzzi NS, Patterson BM, Stearns KL, Krebs VE, Mont MA. Skin closure with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and polyester mesh after primary total knee arthroplasty offers superior cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared to staples: a prospective trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30:447-53.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02591-4

PMid:31691153 

27. Koonce SL, Eck DL, Shaddix KK, Perdikis G. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl), octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond), and subcuticular suture for closure of surgical incisions. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:107-10.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318289856f

PMid:24905134 

28. Aslam MI, Hunter DC. Does liquid tissue adhesive increase satisfaction with wound and stoma management after surgery?. J Wound Care. 2009;18:391-4.

https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2009.18.9.44311

PMid:19789476 

29. Borie E, Rosas E, Kuramochi G, Etcheberry S , Olate S, Weber B. Oral applications of cyanoacrylate adhesives: a literature review. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019:8217602.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8217602

PMid:31008113 PMCid:PMC6441539