1. Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Carious Tissue Removal. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28:58-67.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271

PMid:27099358 

2. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res. 2010;89:1063-7.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376071

PMid:20660797 

3. Gryst ME, Mount GJ. The use of glass ionomer in special needs patients. Aust Dent J. 1999;44: 268-74.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1999.tb00231.x

PMid:10687236 

4. Fisher J, Varenne B, Narvaez D, Vickers C. The Minamata Convention and the phase down of dental amalgam. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96:436-8.

https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.203141

PMid:29904227 PMCid:PMC5996207

5. Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J. 2017;222:337-44.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.214

PMid:28281590 

6. Moshaverinia M, Navas A, Jahedmanesh N, Shah KC, Moshaverinia A, Ansari S. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122:154-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.012

PMid:31326149 

7. Kharma K, Zogheib T, Bhandi S, Mehanna C. Clinical Evaluation of Microhybrid Composite and Glass lonomer Restorative Material in Permanent Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:226-32.

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2241

PMid:29422475 

8. Frencken JE, Leal SC, Navarro MF. Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:1337-46.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0783-4

PMid:22824915 PMCid:PMC3443346

9. Buchanan H, Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12:47-52.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7439.2001.00322.x

PMid:11853248 

10. Chandler-Gutiérrez L, Martínez-Sahuquillo A, Bullón-Fernández P. Evaluation of medical risk in dental practice through using the EMRRH questionnaire. Med Oral. 2004;9:309-20.

PMid:15292870

11. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:5-33.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7

PMid:17262225 

12. Ruengrungsom C, Palamara JEA, Burrow MF. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review. J Dent. 2018;78:1-21.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.008

PMid:30017937 

13. Krämer N, Schmidt M, Lücker S, Domann E, Frankenberger R. Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:1019-31.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2184-1

PMid:28741172 

14. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J. 2000;50:1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x

PMid:10945174 

15. Molina GF, Faulks D, Mazzola I, Cabral RJ, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Three-year survival of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations in people with disability. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:461-7.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2134-y

PMid:28547182 

16. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:58.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-58

PMid:21396097 PMCid:PMC3060833

17. Sidhu SK. Clinical evaluations of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Dent Mater. 2010;26:7-12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.015

PMid:19801167 

18. Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater. 2011;27:1031-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.004

PMid:21840585 

19. Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Yalcin Cakir F, Ergin E. A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities. J Dent. 2020;94:103175.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.013

PMid:31351909 

20. Pacifici E, Bossù M, Giovannetti A, La Torre G, Guerra F, Polimeni A. Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for uncooperative patients according to surface protection treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2013;4:250-8.

PMid:24611090

21. Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:31-7.

PMid:12674356

22. Diem VT, Tyas MJ, Ngo HC, Phuong LH, Khanh ND. The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:753-9.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1026-z

PMid:23832616 

23. Türkün LS, Kanik Ö. A Prospective Six-Year Clinical Study Evaluating Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements with Resin Coating on Posterior Teeth: Quo Vadis?. Oper Dent. 2016;41:587-98.

https://doi.org/10.2341/15-331-C

PMid:27571238 

24. Frankenberger R, Dudek MC, Winter J, Braun A, Krämer N, von Stein-Lausnitz M, et al. Amalgam Alternatives Critically Evaluated: Effect of Long-term Thermomechanical Loading on Marginal Quality, Wear, and Fracture Behavior. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22:107-16.

PMid:32030381

25. Lazaridou D, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1485-92.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1373-4

PMid:25491442 

26. Heintze SD, Reichl FX, Hickel R. Wear of dental materials:Clinical significance and laboratory wear simulation methods -A review. Dent Mater J. 2019;38:343-53.

https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-140

PMid:30918233 

27. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55:58-63.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359709091943

PMid:9083578 

28. Tavares M, Lindefjeld Calabi KA, San Martin L. Systemic diseases and oral health. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58:797-814.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.07.005

PMid:25201543 

29. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28:87-101.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003

PMid:22192253