Corahua-Raymi N, Guardia-Huamani S, Cervantes-Ganoza L, Castro-Ramírez L, López-Gurreonero C, Cornejo-Pinto A, Cayo-Rojas C. Shear bond strength of three different metal bracket base designs on human premolars: An in vitro comparative study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(1):e78-83.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.61166

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61166

________

 

References

1. Rajesh RN, Girish KS, Sanjay N, Scindhia RD, Kumar SG, Rajesh S. Comparison of Bond Strength of Brackets with Foil Mesh and Laser Structure Base using Light Cure Composite Resin: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16:963-70.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1789
PMid:27018031

 

2. Kilponen L, Varrela J, Vallittu PK. Priming and bonding metal, ceramic and polycarbonate brackets. Biomater Investig Dent. 2019;6:61-72.
https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1684823
PMid:31998873 PMCid:PMC6964778

 

3. Hodecker LD, Scheurer M, Scharf S, Roser CJ, Fouda AM, Bourauel C, Lux CJ, Bauer CAJ. Influence of Individual Bracket Base Design on the Shear Bond Strength of In-Office 3D Printed Brackets-An In Vitro Study. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14:289.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060289
PMid:37367253 PMCid:PMC10299418

 

4. Agarwal K, Shetty S, Desai A: Effect of various mesh designs on shear bond strength of new and recycled brackets: a comparative, invitro study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14:211-218. 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.11472

 

5. Reynolds I.R. A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding. Br. J. Orthod. 1975;2:171-178.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666

 

6. Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: A study with the scanning electron microscope. Am. J. Orthod. 1981;79:500-522.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(81)90462-0
PMid:6453531

 

7. Morales K, Garces G, Yagnam S, Bustos V, Belfus J, Rojas V. Comparison of shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to a CAD/CAM prosthetic provisional material after the use of a self-adhesive resin cement versus a light adhesive paste and different surface conditioning protocols: An in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2022;20:100661.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100661
PMid:35764503

 

8. Tatis D, Giraldo D. Estudio comparativo de la resistencia adhesiva in vitro de seis tipos de brackets de diferentes marcas comerciales. Ortodoncia Actual. 2012;9:54-60

 

9. Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Collesano V, Tovt G, Bernardinelli L, Gandini P. Dental Hygiene and Orthodontics: Effect of Ultrasonic Instrumentation on Bonding Efficacy of Different Lingual Orthodontic Brackets. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3714651.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3714651
PMid:28904955 PMCid:PMC5585592

 

10. Ansari MY, Agarwal DK, Gupta A, Bhattacharya P, Ansar J, Bhandari R. Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: Comparative In-vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZC64-ZC68.
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/20624.8910
PMid:28050507 PMCid:PMC5198460

 

11. Cozza P, Martucci L, De Toffol L, Penco SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:851-6.

 

12. Martalia C, Anggitia C, Hamid T, Sjamsudin J. The comparison of shear bond strength of metal orthodontics bracket to porcelain surface using silane and single bond: An in vitro study. J Int Salud Bucal 2020;12:470-475
https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_52_20

 

13. 1.V. Izquierdo, L. A. et al. Comparative Study of Adhesion of Brackets with Metal Injection Molding (MIM) Technology and Welded bases: In vitro Study. The Open Dentistry Journal 2020;14:240-246.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010240

 

14. Ahangar Atashi MH, Sadr Haghighi AH, Nastarin P, Ahangar Atashi S. Variations in enamel damage after debonding of two different bracket base designs: An in vitro study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12:56-62.
https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.009
PMid:29732022 PMCid:PMC5928475

 

15. Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:301-4.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136338
PMid:25125839 PMCid:PMC4127685

 

16. Sharifi N, Mohammadi Z, Arab S, Shojaee M, Vafadoost F, Zakerzadeh A. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with a Self-Adhering Composite in Dry and Saliva-Contaminated Conditions. Front Dent. 2022;19:5.
https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v19i5.8548
PMid:35937155 PMCid:PMC9294715

 

17. Cayo CF, Carrillo AAC. Marginal sealing applying sodium hypochlorite versus phosphoric acid as dental conditioner. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2020;57:e2872.

 

18. ISO/TS 11405:2015 - Dentistry - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure.

 

19. Dalaie K, Mirfasihi A, Eskandarion S, Kabiri S. Effect of bracket base design on shear bond strength to feldspathic porcelain. Eur J Dent. 2016;10:351-355.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.184161
PMid:27403052 PMCid:PMC4926587

 

20. Sorel O, El Alam R, Chagneau F, Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:260-6.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125834
PMid:12226606

 

21. Castillo H, Alvizo J. y Oliver R. Resistencia al desalojo de tres diferentes bases de brackets metálicos a esmalte humano. Ortodoncia Actual. 2013;9:36-40.

 

22. Chaudhary, G., Mattevi, G., y Gakunga, P). Comparison of shear bond strength of four types of orthodontic brackets with different base technologies. APOS Trends in Orthodontics, 2017;7:273-273
https://doi.org/10.4103/apos.apos_91_17

 

23. Molina F, Freitas KMS, Binz Ordóñez MCR, Cruz EF, Henriques RP, Aguirre Balseca GM. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of MIM Technology Brackets with Conventional and Rail-Shaped Mesh Bases: An Study. The Open Dentistry Journal, 2019;13:255-260.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601913010255

 

24. Lo Giudice G, Lo Giudice A, Isola G, Fabiano F, Artemisia A, Fabiano V, et al. Evaluation of the bond strength and the distribution of the detachment interface of different bracket base designs. Acta Med. Mediterr. 2015;31:585-590.

 

25. Nóbrega T, Youssef M. Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets Recycling with Aluminum Oxide. The Journal of Dentist. 2020;8:31-36.
https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8695.2020.08.6

 

26. Bishara SE, Soliman MM, Oonsombat C, Laffoon JF, Ajlouni R. The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:400-4.

 

27. Pickett KL, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, Lacefield W. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:141-8.

 

28. Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DD, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:65-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.003
PMid:14718881

 

29. Hussain HD, Ajith SD, Goel P. Nickel release from stainless steel and nickel titanium archwires - An in vitro study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016;6:213-218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2016.06.001
PMid:27761386 PMCid:PMC5064993

 

30. Shaikh WA, Kalia A, Mulla FA. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets recylced using different methods: An in-vitro study. Int J Oral Health Dent 2022;8:242-248.
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijohd.2022.046