Huynh NCN, Tran ATV, Truong TNT, Le YT, Tran NC, Tran TTN, Wang DH, Hsu ML. Correlation of resin composite translucency and IOS accuracy: An in-vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(6):e678-84.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.61620

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61620

______

 

References

1. Yadav R, Kumar M. Dental restorative composite materials: A review. Journal of Oral Biosciences. J Oral Biosci. 2019;61:78-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.job.2019.04.001
PMid:31109861

 

2. Salas M, Lucena C, Herrera LJ, Yebra A, Della Bona A, Pérez MM. Translucency thresholds for dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34:1168-1174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.001
PMid:29764698

 

3. AlGhazali N, Burnside G, Smith RW, Preston AJ, Jarad FD. Performance assessment of Vita Easy Shade spectrophotometer on colour measurement of aesthetic dental materials. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2011;19:168-74.

PMid:22645803

 

4. Nguyen NDM, Tran NC, Tran TTN, Huynh NCN, Nguyen KD, Hoang HT, et al., Effects of core build-up resin composite translucency on IOS accuracy: an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2023;26:201-210.

PMid:36625373

 

5. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Aaronson, Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008;29:494, 496, 498-505.

PMid:18935788

 

6. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision. J Vis Exp. 2014:86:51374.
https://doi.org/10.3791/51374-v
PMid:24836007 PMCid:PMC4183083

 

7. Pereira ALC, Curinga MRS, Segundo HVM, Carreiro AFP. Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review. 2023;129:855-862
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.001
PMid:34656307

 

8. Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner. 2020;29:107-113.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13135
PMid:31860144

 

9. Minh HN, Nguyena ATD, Trana TTN, Nguyena KD, Huynha NCN. 3D-printed inlays with different cavity depths impact intraoral-scanner's accuracy in-vitro. MedPharmRes. 2023;7:87-94.
https://doi.org/10.32895/UMP.MPR.7.4.11

 

10. Vo HM, Huynh NCN, Tran TTN, Hoang HT, Nguyen ATL. Influence of titanium dioxide and composite on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner for bilateral upper posterior edentulous jaw (Kennedy class I) scanning: An in vitro study. J Dent. 2023;139:104747.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104747
PMid:37863172

 

11. l'éclairage, C.i.d. and I. Beleuchtungskommission, Colorimetry. 2018: International Commission on Illumination.

 

12. Kim D, Park SH. Color and Translucency of Resin-based Composites: Comparison of A-shade Specimens Within Various Product Lines. Oper Dent. 2018;43:642-655.
https://doi.org/10.2341/17-228-L
PMid:29630487

 

13. Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Sanohkan S. Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners. Biomed Res Int. 2021:2021:2673040.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2673040
PMid:34552983 PMCid:PMC8452395

 

14. Diker B, Tak Ö. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12:299-306.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.299
PMid:33149851 PMCid:PMC7604233

 

15. Dutton E, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Culp A, et al., The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32:204-218.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12528
PMid:31568660

 

16. Vafaee F, Firouz F, Mohajeri M, Hashemi R, Gholiabad SG. In vitro Comparison of the Accuracy (Precision and Trueness) of Seven Dental Scanners. J Dent (Shiraz). 2021;22:8-13.

PMid:33681417 PMCid:PMC7921766

 

17. van der Zel JM, Vlaar S, de Ruiter WJ, Davidson C. The CICERO system for CAD/CAM fabrication of full-ceramic crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2001;85:261-7.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114399
PMid:11264933

 

18. Denissen H, Dozić A, van der Zel J, van Waas M. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:506-13.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.110258
PMid:11105006

 

19. Groten M, Axmann D, Pröbster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:40-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
PMid:10633021

 

20. Mandelli F, Gherlone E, Gastaldi G, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model: A 3D analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61:363-370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.09.002
PMid:27771189