Huynh NCN, Tran
ATV, Truong TNT, Le YT, Tran NC, Tran TTN, Wang DH, Hsu ML. Correlation of
resin composite translucency and IOS accuracy: An in-vitro study. J Clin
Exp Dent. 2024;16(6):e678-84.
doi:10.4317/jced.61620
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61620
______
References
1.
Yadav R, Kumar M. Dental restorative composite materials: A review. Journal
of Oral Biosciences. J Oral Biosci. 2019;61:78-83. |
|
|
|
2.
Salas M, Lucena C, Herrera LJ, Yebra A, Della Bona A, Pérez MM. Translucency
thresholds for dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34:1168-1174. |
|
|
|
3.
AlGhazali N, Burnside G, Smith RW, Preston AJ, Jarad FD. Performance
assessment of Vita Easy Shade spectrophotometer on colour measurement of
aesthetic dental materials. European Journal of Prosthodontics and
Restorative Dentistry. 2011;19:168-74. PMid:22645803 |
|
|
|
4.
Nguyen NDM, Tran NC, Tran TTN, Huynh NCN, Nguyen KD, Hoang HT, et al.,
Effects of core build-up resin composite translucency on IOS accuracy: an
in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2023;26:201-210. PMid:36625373 |
|
|
|
5.
Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Aaronson, Dental impressions using 3D digital
scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008;29:494,
496, 498-505. PMid:18935788 |
|
|
|
6. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure
trueness and precision. J Vis Exp. 2014:86:51374. |
|
|
|
7.
Pereira ALC, Curinga MRS, Segundo HVM, Carreiro AFP. Factors that influence
the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated
with multiple implants: A systematic review. 2023;129:855-862 |
|
|
|
8.
Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Clinical study of
the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness
and precision) of an intraoral scanner. 2020;29:107-113. |
|
|
|
9.
Minh HN, Nguyena ATD, Trana TTN, Nguyena KD, Huynha NCN. 3D-printed inlays
with different cavity depths impact intraoral-scanner's accuracy in-vitro.
MedPharmRes. 2023;7:87-94. |
|
|
|
10.
Vo HM, Huynh NCN, Tran TTN, Hoang HT, Nguyen ATL. Influence of titanium
dioxide and composite on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner for bilateral
upper posterior edentulous jaw (Kennedy class I) scanning: An in vitro study.
J Dent. 2023;139:104747. |
|
|
|
11.
l'éclairage, C.i.d. and I. Beleuchtungskommission, Colorimetry. 2018:
International Commission on Illumination. |
|
|
|
12.
Kim D, Park SH. Color and Translucency of Resin-based Composites: Comparison
of A-shade Specimens Within Various Product Lines. Oper Dent. 2018;43:642-655. |
|
|
|
13. Amornvit P, Rokaya D,
Sanohkan S. Comparison of Accuracy of
Current Ten Intraoral Scanners. Biomed Res Int. 2021:2021:2673040. |
|
|
|
14.
Diker B, Tak Ö. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared
teeth and effect of scanning sequence. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12:299-306. |
|
|
|
15.
Dutton E, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Culp A, et al., The effect
different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different
intraoral scanners. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32:204-218. |
|
|
|
16.
Vafaee F, Firouz F, Mohajeri M, Hashemi R, Gholiabad SG. In vitro Comparison
of the Accuracy (Precision and Trueness) of Seven Dental Scanners. J Dent
(Shiraz). 2021;22:8-13. PMid:33681417
PMCid:PMC7921766 |
|
|
|
17.
van der Zel JM, Vlaar S, de Ruiter WJ, Davidson C. The CICERO system for
CAD/CAM fabrication of full-ceramic crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry. 2001;85:261-7. |
|
|
|
18.
Denissen H, Dozić A, van der Zel J, van Waas M. Marginal fit and short-term
clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:506-13. |
|
|
|
19. Groten M, Axmann D,
Pröbster L, Weber H. Determination of
the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical
in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:40-9. |
|
|
|
20.
Mandelli F, Gherlone E, Gastaldi G, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the accuracy of
extraoral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model: A 3D
analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61:363-370. |