Farag D,
Almufti A, Alghalayini M, Shaheen N, Darwish M, Sadek S. Post-cementation
sensitivity of bridges cemented with different adhesive resin cements. J Clin
Exp Dent. 2025;17(3):e289-92.
doi:10.4317/jced.62513
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62513
___
References
|
1.
Heboyan A, Vardanyan A, Karobari MI, Marya A, Avagyan T, Tebyaniyan H,
Mustafa M, et al. Avetisyan A. Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive
Review. Molecules. 2023;28(4):1619. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Hilton T, Hilton D, Randall R, Ferracane JL. A clinical comparison of two
cements for levels of post operative sensitivity in a practice-based setting.
Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:241-248. PMid:15195722 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Yoneda S, Morigami M, Sugizaki J, Yamada T. Short term clinical evaluation of
a resin modified glass -ionomer luting cement. Quintessence Int. 2005;36:49-53. PMid:15709497 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Sayed ME. The Effect of Dentine Desensitizing Agents on the Retention of
Cemented Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review. Medicina.
2023;59(3):515. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Dahl BL. Dentine/pulp reactions to full crown preparation procedures. J Oral
Reahbil. 1977;4:247-254. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Langeland K, Langeland LK. Pulp reactions to crown preparation, impression,
temporary crown fixation and permanent cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 1965;15:129-143. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Ahlquist M, Franzen O, Coffey J, Pashley D. Dental pain evoked by hydrostatic
pressures applied to exposed dentin in man: a test of the hydrodynamic theory
of dentin sensitivity. J Endod. 1994;20:130-134. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Balaji A, Jei JB, Muthukumar B. Comparison and evaluation of the effect of
polymerization of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and dual-cure resin
cement on the crystalline structure of dentin using synchrotron X-ray
diffraction and its clinical correlation with postoperative sensitivity. J Indian
Prosthodont Soc. 2023;23(2):119-126. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Brannstrom M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc.
1992;88(supplement 1):7-13. PMid:1508916 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Zach L, Cohen G. Thermogenesis in operative dentistry: Comparison of four
methods. J Prosthet Dent. 1962;12:977-984. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Goodis HE, Schein B, Stauffer P. Temperature changes measured in vivo at the
dentinoenamel junction and pulpodentin junction during cavity preparation in
the Maccaca fascicularis monkey. J Endod. 1988;14:336-339. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Johnson JH, Gordon GE, and Bales DJ. Postoperative sensitivity associated
with posterior composite and amlgam restorations. Operative Dentistry. 1988;13:66-73. PMid:3270041 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumanns M, Verschueren M, Gladys M, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et
al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res. 1995;73:1690-1702. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellmans L, Lambrechts P,
Vanherle G. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial hard-tissue
interfaces. J Dent Res 2000; 79:709-714. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Behr M. Rosentritt M. Regnet T. Handel, G. Marginal adaptation in dentin of a
self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried system. Dent
Mater. 2004;20:191-197. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges J S. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive.
Effect on postoperative sensitivity. JADA. 2003;134:1621-1629. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
de Souza Costa CA, Nascimento ABL, Teixra HM. Response of human pulps
following acid conditioning and application of a bonding agent in deep
cavities. Dent Mater. 2002;18:543-551. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Hebling J, Giro EMA, de Souza Costa CA. Human pulp response after an adhesive
system application in deep cavities. J Dent. 1999;27:557-564. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay FR, Svizero NR, Sano H, Kaga M. Fluid movement across
the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. J Dent Res. 2004;
83:843-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Hanks CT, Strawn SE, Wataha JC, Craig R. Cytotoxic effects of resin
components on cultured mammalian fibroblasts. J Dent Res. 1991;70:1450-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Bouillageut S, Show L, Gonzales L, Wataha JC, Kreijci I. Long-term
cytotoxicity of resin-based dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil.
2002;29:7-13. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Randall RC. Human pulp response to resin
cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater. 2006;22:954-962. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Shetty RM, Bhat S, Mehta D, Srivatsa G, Shetty YB. Comparative analysis of
postcementation hypersensitivity with glass ionomer cement and a resin
cement: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(3):327-331. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Blatz MB, Mante FK, Saleh N, Atlas AM, Mannan S, Ozer F. Postoperative tooth
sensitivity with a new self-adhesive resin cement-a randomized clinical trial.
Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17:793-798. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Saad Del-D, Atta O, El-Mowafy O. The postoperative sensitivity of fixed
partial dentures cemented with self-adhesive resin cements: a clinical study.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(12):1459-466. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive.
Effect on post-operative sensitivity. JADA. 2003;134:1621-1629 |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Nayyar S, Tewari S, Arora B. Comparison of human pulp response to total-etch
and self-etch bonding agents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod. 2007;104:45-52. |
|